If two rational actors—a business owner and a willing laborer—enter into a voluntary exchange of labor for compensation, then any third-party interference, especially from the state, is a coercive distortion of market equilibrium. The so-called “illegality” of the worker is a bureaucratic fiction; what matters in a capitalist system is utility, productivity, and mutual benefit—not papers, borders, or permission slips from a parasitic regulator class. Government intervention in this transaction is nothing more than anti-market authoritarianism masquerading as law.

>>509922779
Because arresting them violates free market principles

Why does /pol/ like to pretend like pic rel isn't how every rich person made their fortune? At least that brought us cheap groceries

I am a conservative, I believe businesses deserve to hire whoever works best for the least amount of pay

If you support affordable groceries then you should support illegal workers.

The meme that broke /pol/

Hiring undocumented labor isn’t a moral dilemma, it’s economic optimization. I vaporize overhead, outcompete your bloated payroll, and pass the surplus to customers while wagecucked NPCs cry foul. Newsflash: the people screeching about “illegals” aren’t capital owners, they’re obsolete labor units angry that the market priced in their redundancy.

Have you ever run a business? Have you paid the inflated costs tied to hiring citizens, government mandates, liability exposure, forced benefits, and firing restrictions? Or do you just expect others to bankroll your nationalist ideal?

Illegals work. No complaints, no lawsuits, no inflated demands. That’s how independent shops survive.

Citizens expect HR departments, full benefits, and legal protections. Only large corporations can absorb that.

Let them hire who ever they want, you would do the same in their situation.