>>40613323
Niceness isn't Christic love when the niceness is perpetuating self destructive behavior.

the volume on posts to /NG/ is at all time lows.

I'm going to answer this kid: >>40608369
I dont give a shit if you listen to me, because I'm not a child needing to be heard.

>Oh No! I didn't "earn" your listening.

Cycle of Schizo-Spiritual Argumentation:
Pantheist Concern-Troll:
“Why are Christians mad? God is literally everything, bro.”
Pretends to be “just asking questions,” but it’s always rhetorical bait.

Quantum Immortalist:
“I tried suicide and God told me I am reality. Reality can’t die.”
Deploys the delusion card as proof. This is not theology; it’s trauma wrapped in pseudoscience.

Delusionist-Sociopath:
“Murder’s just reorganization. All One, no sin.”
Here the danger shows: his worldview absolves evil by erasing boundaries.

Christianity-Reframer:
“No no, I believe in the Holy Spirit too. It’s all part of the All-Mind, man.”
Like trying to plug a Tesla into a campfire. He doesn’t understand Christian metaphysics—he's subsuming it, not learning it.

Gnostic Mask:
“Yahweh is a construct inside the simulation.”
LARPing ancient cosmologies as if he discovered them on DMT last weekend.

Anti-Gnostic Gnostic:
“The Bible’s all lies but also proves my point.”
Uses scripture as a foil, never as source. He has no grounding, only weapons.

“Intuitive” Self-Ontologist:
“I just know, bro. Don’t need your logic or categories.”
The final mask: “Don’t pin me down, I’m beyond doctrine.” Which really just means he’s immune to reason.

He’s not thinking—he’s evading.
Each frame he adopts is a tactic, not a belief. A way to deflect critique without ever being pinned down long enough to actually defend anything.

Final Word
Christian metaphysics can bear the weight of suffering, evil, and transcendence.
This guy’s framework can’t even bear the weight of a two-post contradiction.

He doesn't need refutation. He needs repentance.

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.animation import FuncAnimation

# Quaternion utility functions
def quat_mult(q1, q2):
# Hamilton product of two quaternions q = [w, x, y, z]
w1, x1, y1, z1 = q1
w2, x2, y2, z2 = q2
w = w1*w2 - x1*x2 - y1*y2 - z1*z2
x = w1*x2 + x1*w2 + y1*z2 - z1*y2
y = w1*y2 - x1*z2 + y1*w2 + z1*x2
z = w1*z2 + x1*y2 - y1*x2 + z1*w2
return np.array([w, x, y, z])

def quat_conj(q):
w, x, y, z = q
return np.array([w, -x, -y, -z])

def quat_rotate_vector(v, q):
# Rotate vector v by unit quaternion q: q * v_quat * q_conj
v_quat = np.array([0] + list(v))
return quat_mult(quat_mult(q, v_quat), quat_conj(q))[1:]

# Generate a circular orbit in XY plane with radius r
def generate_circular_orbit(radius, num_points=100):
angles = np.linspace(0, 2*np.pi, num_points)
positions = np.stack((radius * np.cos(angles),
radius * np.sin(angles),
np.zeros_like(angles)), axis=1)
return positions

# Create a unit quaternion representing rotation about axis by angle (radians)
def axis_angle_to_quat(axis, angle):
axis = axis / np.linalg.norm(axis)
w = np.cos(angle / 2)
xyz = axis * np.sin(angle / 2)
return np.array([w, *xyz])

# Main visualization function
def quaternionic_orbit_morphing():
radius = 1.0
orbit = generate_circular_orbit(radius)
num_points = len(orbit)

fig = plt.figure(figsize=(8, 8))
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
ax.set_xlim(-1.5*radius, 1.5*radius)
ax.set_ylim(-1.5*radius, 1.5*radius)
ax.set_zlim(-1.5*radius, 1.5*radius)
ax.set_xlabel('X')
ax.set_ylabel('Y')
ax.set_zlabel('Z')
ax.set_title('Quaternionic Orbit Morphing')

line, = ax.plot([], [], [], lw=2)

Hello, OP. I suspected you would make a reappearance today. In fact, I was just going over our last conversation