>>507580759
>someone who lived very far away claims you said something you didn't
>hurr she lied!!
If you cared about truth of what she said then you'd use the best methodology available to us to determine that. They literally use it on your books as well when they do textual criticism and it has further exposed your religion. btw even muslim traditional schoalrs have approved of it http://www.drjonathanbrown.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/How-We-Know-Early-Hadith-Critics-Did-Matn-Criticism-and-Why-Its-So-Hard-to-Find.pdf again it doesn't matter she literally called herself a woman as mentioned earlier in pic >>507579461 and she had attained puberty. So no matter what she was a biological adult even according to Christian standards. But anyway as demonstrated I have very strong reasons to reject the authenticity of that number you are all so fond of