>>715775828
I haven't made any arguments on whether AI art surpasses human art. The only argument I've made is that you demonstrably can't distinguish between AI art and human art. You also can't distinguish between AI output and human output if the human just redresses the AI output. You're claiming that you can make a qualitative assessment based on a content's label when you don't even have a definite method of labeling it. I don't know what to call this, let me ask an AI real quick.