>>81954087
>I'm not even arguing women will stop being hostile
That's good, because they won't.
>I'm just pointing out that your experiences in life shape your genes
and I'm saying that they don't, not in the way you think anyway. Lamarckism is largely discredited(although not completely). It's a much longer process than raising a good kid and expecting their offspring to inherit the same traits, it just doesn't work that way.
>worst genes have been reinforced for years
That, I can not argue with. You're right. Women had little to no selection pressure and none of the overt displays of their traits interfered with their reproductive success in the past and therefore the amounts of matrilineal genetic detriment they're harboring is incomprehensible.
Perhaps instead of entertaining fantasies of saving women from the powers that be, people should start appreciating feminism for performing the first ever selective mass culling of females, which will help a lot with mental illnesses and balding, but don't ever expect the underlying hostility to go away because it goes much deeper than a mental disorder.