Search Results
6/9/2025, 12:36:53 AM
>>40495825
I’m sorry if my tone hurt your fee fees. Your initial post made it clear you understand absolutely fuckall about the current model of gravity or the electric universe theory. Yes, things fall down on earth, but the observable downward accelerative bias is easily explained via electrostatics, density and buoyancy, all of which, unlike gravity, are scientifically testable and provable. for example:
>>40392146
>>40392148
>>40395107
Both Newtonian and Einsteinian Gravity, on the other hand, have been falsified for over a century now. In 1933 Fritz Zwicky made observations of the Coma cluster which disproved gravity on the cosmological scale. It’s been falsified on the “solar system” scale as well by observations of Mercury’s perihelion shift and by simple mathematical analysis of the gravitational relationship of the Sun and the moon outlined in the video linked to here:
https://old.bitchute.com/video/2oqymRsyzdPO/
and gravity isn’t even claimed to be compatible with the equations derived from quantum mechanics. To sum it up for you: Gravity has been bodybagged. the reason you’re unaware of this fact is bc you haven’t put forth the time and effort necessary to educate yourself on the subject matter.
>I never said I was a mathematician or electrical engineer
I never said you were either, or that you needed to be in order to understand the basic properties of earth’s measurable electric field. Read the posts linked here carefully:
>>40492746
and see if you can find a way to resolve the issues being outlined. If you don’t want to, fine, just know that your belief in a spherical earth, and heliocentrism in general, is nothing more than religious conviction since you refuse to actually personally investigate or question any of the foundational claims being made by your high priests.
I’m sorry if my tone hurt your fee fees. Your initial post made it clear you understand absolutely fuckall about the current model of gravity or the electric universe theory. Yes, things fall down on earth, but the observable downward accelerative bias is easily explained via electrostatics, density and buoyancy, all of which, unlike gravity, are scientifically testable and provable. for example:
>>40392146
>>40392148
>>40395107
Both Newtonian and Einsteinian Gravity, on the other hand, have been falsified for over a century now. In 1933 Fritz Zwicky made observations of the Coma cluster which disproved gravity on the cosmological scale. It’s been falsified on the “solar system” scale as well by observations of Mercury’s perihelion shift and by simple mathematical analysis of the gravitational relationship of the Sun and the moon outlined in the video linked to here:
https://old.bitchute.com/video/2oqymRsyzdPO/
and gravity isn’t even claimed to be compatible with the equations derived from quantum mechanics. To sum it up for you: Gravity has been bodybagged. the reason you’re unaware of this fact is bc you haven’t put forth the time and effort necessary to educate yourself on the subject matter.
>I never said I was a mathematician or electrical engineer
I never said you were either, or that you needed to be in order to understand the basic properties of earth’s measurable electric field. Read the posts linked here carefully:
>>40492746
and see if you can find a way to resolve the issues being outlined. If you don’t want to, fine, just know that your belief in a spherical earth, and heliocentrism in general, is nothing more than religious conviction since you refuse to actually personally investigate or question any of the foundational claims being made by your high priests.
Page 1