Search Results
6/23/2025, 5:06:12 PM
>>212038758
kerron kyllä tänne sitten miten käy saatte nauraa taikka kihistä taikka mitä ikinä tunteita herättääkään
kerron kyllä tänne sitten miten käy saatte nauraa taikka kihistä taikka mitä ikinä tunteita herättääkään
6/22/2025, 12:09:57 AM
6/19/2025, 12:43:59 PM
>>63851964
Iran would most probably win in a defensive war. In the hypothetical case that Israel + the USA were to try to invade Iran like the mutts did in 2003, they wouldn't be able to hold any ground. Sure, they will absolutely have dominion over the Iranian skies and sea, however that advantage will be mostly nullified by the fact that Iran is littered with mountain ranges and other geographical barriers that would block any advancement inland.
This is not the 2010's anymore. Thanks to the war in Ukraine, it has been all but proven that to success in a invasion against another country means not only having a solid domain over the enemy sky and sea, but also being able to hold and gain ground in a battle of attrition. We need to remember that Ukraine had EVERYTHING going against it when the war started: shit geography, shit army, shitty goverment, so on and so forth. And yet, they have managed to endure.
Even without external help, Iran would be way more of a challenge to invade than what Russia has to face with Ukraine. They have a geographical and manpower advantage, more than enough resources to at least hold their ground in a defensive warfare, more than enought experience with asymetric warfare to harm the US and Israel with unconventional tactics, and the magic card of experience in drone warfare thanks to their intervention in the Ukraine war.
Invading Iran would be a massive strategical mistake for the US and Israel alike. What they should do is make use of their superior aerial power and pummel Iran from a distance. I doubt they will manage to stop their nuclear arsenal that way, but it's way better than the bloodshed it would mean an invasion.
Iran would most probably win in a defensive war. In the hypothetical case that Israel + the USA were to try to invade Iran like the mutts did in 2003, they wouldn't be able to hold any ground. Sure, they will absolutely have dominion over the Iranian skies and sea, however that advantage will be mostly nullified by the fact that Iran is littered with mountain ranges and other geographical barriers that would block any advancement inland.
This is not the 2010's anymore. Thanks to the war in Ukraine, it has been all but proven that to success in a invasion against another country means not only having a solid domain over the enemy sky and sea, but also being able to hold and gain ground in a battle of attrition. We need to remember that Ukraine had EVERYTHING going against it when the war started: shit geography, shit army, shitty goverment, so on and so forth. And yet, they have managed to endure.
Even without external help, Iran would be way more of a challenge to invade than what Russia has to face with Ukraine. They have a geographical and manpower advantage, more than enough resources to at least hold their ground in a defensive warfare, more than enought experience with asymetric warfare to harm the US and Israel with unconventional tactics, and the magic card of experience in drone warfare thanks to their intervention in the Ukraine war.
Invading Iran would be a massive strategical mistake for the US and Israel alike. What they should do is make use of their superior aerial power and pummel Iran from a distance. I doubt they will manage to stop their nuclear arsenal that way, but it's way better than the bloodshed it would mean an invasion.
6/19/2025, 9:22:17 AM
Page 1