>>58005592
>The same thing with how there's no "healthy" hate anymore. Practically, everything critical or negative is condemned as hostile, even if it's just the plain truth
It's always been this way though, what changes is who's in control deciding what's allowed to be said, whether it's a religious institution or or a government or (((the market))) or some combination of all three.
>but for some reason, unhealthy love is not only left unsupervised, but also endorsed.
Yet this is also true, it's hugboxing which is typically feminine behavior. Boundless love is useful for raising children and keeping community together but obviously it can't be applied to every single situation ever. Not everyone is "valid".
>>58005599
>polyamory
Peak degeneracy, any culture promoting this (destruction of the traditional family unit as usual) will either become or is already a society resting on a house of cards. Inviting any new person to your home stranger or not, and not supervising them, is just another opportunity for your kids to get abused. Only people who don't prioritize their kids over all else will get involved with polyamory, so sometimes they don't even have kids at all (for the better I guess)
>It's intentional.
Commies, Frankfurt School, 1965 Hart-Cellar Act, list goes on. Though if that stuff's boring, it's interesting to listen to timelines of popular western music from the early 1900s or prior leading up to the present and how they've devolved to today. Not in terms of whether you like how a song sounds, but what the messaging is, what values they promote and how it is delivered (full sentences and lyrics changing throughout the song to reveal a story or new perspective, songs about various topics, vs single meaningless phrases repeated over and over from start to finish, the topic is usually about hedonism/drugs/alcohol/unmarried sex/"give in to your desires" worded differently)