>>81661543
Many things, but /mbti/ is not the place to post anything vulnerable or sincere.

>>81661479
>It doesn't mean that consistent meaningful contact with such people is always possible, if ever, for any person. It's how very prolonged dehydration makes you doubt if you'd ever drunk water in your life.
Indeed, which is part of why people shouldn't engage in toxic normalfaggotry and moralize at anyone with misanthropic viewpoints, donning their pom poms and cheerlead for humanity, talking about how much they wuv the human race like it's a cartoon for four year olds. Shaming people for feelings which the world spent years or decades hammering into them isn't the right way to go about it.
>Wouldn't this be that most people are usually too lacking in self-agency and too inhumane to be held to humane standards of good/evil in the first place?
That's an interesting take. I wouldn't go that far (there's enough decent and intelligent people that I try not to get too deep into bitterness because that can cause collateral damage and color your feelings towards those who don't deserve it), but would be interesting to read opinions from people who do have that take.