Thread 81623129

THEY'RE IN THE WALLS edition

ANSWER THESE QQuestions (It's Not Optional.)
>Your Type
>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
>what color and style are your underwear
>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?

Previous >>81575723

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) indicates how psychological preferences change how people perceive the world and make decisions.

Don't know your type? Put your answers to the QUESTIONS into this text analyzer. If you didn't write enough text then you won't get a good answer.
https://www.uclassify.com/browse/g4mes543/myers-briggs-type-indicator-text-analyzer

Turbie-Wurbie's Cutesy Test Link Compilation! UwU:
https://pastebin.com/6YSzm68D

Exploration into Enneagram:
https://wiki.personality-database.com/books/enneagram
https://ennealib.carrd.co/

>>81623129 (OP)
I told you it wasn't ripe.

>>81623129 (OP)
>Your Type
According to the uclassify text analyzer I am an ENFJ, known for my super human Heman strength and awesome hair. You'll find me in a suit conquering the Earth with my beautiful Wife and dozens of children.
>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
I'm not entirely sure what would classify a schizophrenic episode. I have never had auditory or visual hallucinations, so I don't think I am schizophrenic.
>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
I hear the creatures, but they exist and I've put out traps.
>what color and style are your underwear
White boxer briefs, like pic related I look like this btw.
>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
In this type of situation I would want everyone to be my slave, productive, practical individuals who I can rely upon to go about the duties a demand of them. So an ISTJ would be the most easy.
The worst type would be for the whole world as ENFJs because these types make very bad slaves refusing to submit and instead going on about them selves and what they believe. There can only be one center of attention in this new world, and that's going to be Me since I will stand out.

>>81623242
You didn't tell me that noony...

which reggies are part of the 50% posting from israel? isfp sophie hater for sure, but any others?

>>81623646
All of the I types. I stands for Israel after all.

I stands for Israel
E stands for Enemy
You're either with us or you're against us terrorist simp

>>81623717
Which mbti types would love Israel the most? Which mbti types due to their dominant functions could hypothetically hate Israel the most?

It's crazy how many people have bought into the Islamic propaganda.

regs are all cheap prostitutes

>>81624388
Not islamic propaganda I acknowledge your kinda as the synagogue of satan, it is clear in the way in which you claim to obey the laws of Moses but then immediately turn to Kabbalah magicks. You are stubborn and unwilling to acknowledge our Father. Repent and be born again.

>>81624881
Pure schizo babble

>>81624388
A lot of retards out there

>>81624910
Jonah is more than a warning

>>81623129 (OP)
>>Your Type
INTP
>>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
No
>>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
No
>>what color and style are your underwear
Monochromatic
>>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
I don't really know

>>81624946
Why are you retarded? What went wrong?

>>81624960
call someone a jewish nigger and you're liable to be called an anti-semite banned from polite society, but call someone a fool and you are in danger of damnation. Repent wicked one, you can change the world for Good and stop the slaughter of innocents

>>81623129 (OP)
>Your Type
isfp 4w5
>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
not schizophrenic so no, but i've had breaks. i had 6 months where i was convinced hilary clinton personally knew that i knew about her misdeeds and that she was somehow connected with aliens who had a higher chance of abducting me if i was thinking about them. and a different time where i was convinced i had hiv and cancer and that the doctors were lying to me and i started losing hair and picking at my chest
>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
no
>what color and style are your underwear
coral orange briefs
>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
istj easily the best. infps easily the worst.

>>81625121
You've been judged. And you're a moron.

>>81623129 (OP)
>(It's Not Optional.)
That's scary.
>Your Type
INFJ-A
>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
Can't say that I have.
>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
Attic creatures? Maybe. Wall creatures? No.
>what color and style are your underwear
Fag questions begone.
>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
I would channel the archetypal power of the universes collective unconscious, convene with the ghost of dead Jung from this universe, ask him to Bridge me to God, and request that God destroy this hypothetical universe for being psychologically unbalanced and simply grotesque.

Which type is most likely to say
>I can fix him

I can fix Kris

>>81625652
>I can fix Kris
. . . a turkey sandwich? An iced tea? what

>>81625626
You shouldn't ask which type would say that, you should ask how each type would project their unconscious when they ask that.
Because every type could and would say that. But for different reasons, and with different unconscious motivations leaking through.

>>81623129 (OP)
INFJ-T
No, psychosis is absent in my family minus those with bipolar (I'm not one of them)
No, but I hear wall creatures who do exist
Black briefs
ENFJs so that the world can be rebuilt by Chads and Stacies

So, when I feel myself wanting to fix a cute girl a stress releasing foot rub, it's really because my own feet are tired? And or I've not yet developed beyond the footsie fixation stage???

Girl Foot Envy

I really wish cute girls didn't have tootsy castrastion anxieties. I only want to touch them, that's all

>>81625966
why are the stocks up so high today

It would more likely mean that you're avoiding something in your own psyche that you feel cannot be fix. Not necessarily that you own feet hurt.
If you wanted to use feet as a metaphor for your own psyche, then yes. That is what it would mean.

>>81626212
High relative to what? Compared against what? Pull up a chair. Define high.

>>81626135
slut

>>81625966
whore

>>81625138
skank

>>81623129 (OP)
mbti is a bullshit system for retards
get into psychosophy and enneagram

>>81626391
The S&P all time highs

>>81626536
>Calls MBTI bullshit
>Has the audacity to mention memeagram

>>81626661
Rate cut anticipation (bond market pricing it in), big bill in senate, tariff suspension extension anticipation, the war is over, jobs are okay, ATH excitedness, et cetera. Speculation, as always.

Personally, I didn't think today was too exciting. Especially looking at volume and open interest. Largest strike was 6150. Gamma exposure at 6200. We'll see what happens tomorrow. I might get excited if we enter positive gamma. If we do, then I'd say we're "high"

>>81624388
>how to completely derail any thread with one post because it will trigger some poltards

something turbie enjoyer would do honestly

lilac and centaur are having sex in my walls

>>81627221
When R9K Reggie Turbie Enjoyer's wife Turbie died he found Kris, a boy who resembled her, had his testicles removed, and had him appear in public as his wife.

>>81626080
Then answer that question smart alek

>>81626135
when will you marry sophie

>>81626080
id eat you like a piece of string cheese bitch

>>81627359
Ever think maybe I don wanna answer it? Why would I answer a question that I asked, huh? HUH? HUH?
>>81627489
Puh-lease, I'd breeze by you like a whole string cheese and squeeze these knees on trees full of bees and sneeze keys of cocaine and Rogaine to grease peas.

>>81627423
There is someone (INFP probably) that I'd enjoy being with and she showed some signs of liking me but I didn't take any of the bait since she was engaged to someone; their relationship was on the rocks but still thought it best to just keep my distance. Otherwise content being single.

sophu nooo you're not help us beat the all reggies are homewrecker allegations

>>81627960
INFJ trait tbqh senpai

A real wokepill is realizing that contrarianism is actually Extroverted Feeling as well. Why? It's still an outside reference, just one that is opposite of the mainstream. Maybe contrarianism is more popular among the I-T- E-FP crowds over say Fe doms (I am an EEII/IIEE fag) but still.

It's not cool or funny to pretend to be gay, or a murderer, or any other abomination

>>81627102
>Gamma exposure at 6200. We'll see what happens tomorrow. I might get excited if we enter positive gamma. If we do, then I'd say we're "high
Put this into Jungian terms for me.

Technical Analysis is just more astrology for men, reading tea leaves in the numbers. Serving Money instead of the Lord, stealing rubles from your neighbor because you "need" it. meanwhile you don't even have a family to spend it on vanity :pensive_emoji:

>>81628533
>He uses TA.
What's next? I bet you're into Astrology and personality types too.

>erm actually quantitative analysis is very valuable and not just gambling with other people money
Shut up nerd.
Remember that time SBF funneled all that money into the Jewkraine and the DNC

>>81628502
But I don't read Jung . . .
It's hard enough as it is when we don't define our terms. Positive gamma compared against what? Zero gamma? Or a squeeze?

I suppose we would be talking about when a person is in the grip of their inferior, rather than for them to be in their business-as-usual dominant. If you could measure the change in the relationship between the two functions (the delta) as the person transitioned, then we'd be looking for when that rate accelerates rapidly (the gamma). If it doesn't accelerate to a degree which we've decided is "rapid", then even if a person transitioned to the grip of their inferior in full, we might call the event "unexciting" from the standpoint of an observer interested in it happening faster than other participants in the observation -- especially if those participants were all placing bets on how long the endeavor would take.

I have no idea if that captures it or not. I don't claim to know anything, after all. Not about the markets, and even less of typology

>>81628701
>I have no idea if that captures it or not. I don't claim to know anything, after all. Not about the markets, and even less of typology
Then why are you here? What functions could cause one to behave this way? Perhaps gamma crush?

>>81628913
>Then why are you here
He's hunting Lilac.
I had a dream about it.
There was a convention and lilac had a table and he walked right up to the table and pointed at her and screamed I FUCKIGN HATE YOU and then they both started laughing. It was scary

>>81628923
>He's hunting Lilac.
Same same but different tbqh

>>81628913
>Then why are you here?
I'm just here for the drama and trolling IV. It's quite high here, after all. Usually ..

What inferior function has the least power? Everyone knows about shadow Se power and Shadow Fi Rizz, but what is the inferior function that just kind of fucks people up hard? My vote is Inferior Introverted Sensation, a balance to the overpowered Extroverted Intuition type.

oh, and I'm also here for patchouli feet . . .
I'm long patch feet; I think they're undervalued. Very, VERY undervalued <3

>>81629144
I've seen many an ISTJ degrade themselves into paranoid messes while in the inferior Ne grip. It's fucking embarrassing, actually

>>81629214
Yeah but that kind of gives them some sort of schizo edge to it. Shadow Ne has potential.

if patchy is a girl then it's unfair that she won't sleep with me. She could fix my incel problem but refuses to if she would just have sex with me the thread would be so much better

>>81623129 (OP)
>Your Type
INFP
>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
No, but my big anxiety episodes sometimes feel very schizophrenic.
>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
No, but I read into house noises.
>what color and style are your underwear
Not wearing any right now
>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
Best would of course be INFP, wprst would be any E

>>81629377
>Not wearing any right now
*sniff sniff* owo

>>81623129 (OP)
INTJ
yes
no
grey boxers
no idea, the one with the most empathy I guess

>>81629334
>Yeah but that kind of gives them some sort of schizo edge to it. Shadow Ne has potential.
lol please explain the potential. What is the schizo advantage?

>>81629355
But what do you offer her? Are you at least bringing a foot rub? You have to bring something, if even but for appearances sake.

>>81629439
There is an inherent irony to the potential of shadow extroverted intuition isn't it? The type that is all about potential has the potential to be powerful, even if it is in the shadow of someone's soul?

Hi anon! ^_^
I am searching for Turbie have you seen her? I really need her T_T

picrel is me whenever I don't see turbie for extended periods of time, i'm totally ok tho

is turbie enjoyer the clingiest reg

>>81629609
>The type that is all about potential has the potential to be powerful, even if it is in the shadow of someone's soul?
Put this in terms that even a small child that has not read Jung could understand.

>>81629916
I think it's a bit self explanatory honestly. Inferior functions is not always negative, it can be expressed as child-like whimsy which is more charming when it's with intuition. Inferior Sensation is just being a fat fuck who likes to party.

When a new user comes into the thread and doesn't identify themselves and doesn't answer the thread questions it's like if you bullied turbie directly you really need to stop doing that and just make Turbie happy instead

>>81628179
>Bare minimum comprehension of directed focus of function is wokepilled
This godforsaken dungheap of a thread. Tch.
How can you tolerate prolonged activity here when something like this even needs to be said? Some sort of saint...

For that matter ...
Sensor != "Good at" sensing/sensation
Intuitive != "Good at" intuiting/intuition
And so on.

Exactly, high preference for extraverted feeling doesn't mean one is any more talented at or aligned with objective social harmony, only that their preoccupation with Fe related matters informs their ultimate typing. In many cases it can amount to someone being insufferably self-assured of their subjective spin on what is harmonious and beneficial to a social subgroup of their own biased affiliation or concern. Just like frequently Ni reliant types can be habitually bad predictors living in their own projection of the impending future influenced solely by their own unaddressed shadow contents rather than in awareness of what is objectively most likely to transpire given current conditions (&+ application of will to those conditions, but that's Actualization AP).

How do we help the apprentices differentiate inferior function/attitude tells (agreeably one of the best ways to type someone else) from absolute individuationlet or too-buried-in-mental-illness usage of dominant?

I told you it wasn't ripe yet.

thqse whq get bqmped ------>

>>81631636
>I am obsessed with you all and the idea of you all being obsessed with someone being obsessed with the idea of you, so I will accuse the beginnings of recovery from identityfaggotry and catastrophic gooner faction wars as sneaky sneaky tricks you are playing on me
You're not important enough to cause anyone to want to fool you. You're just mistaking and projecting your own fervent search for your favorite or most hateboner-worthy posters and some potential ability to spot---or convince yourself you've spotted---them as covert efforts on their parts to fine-tune and better disguise their circlejerks.
If you want to nag someone, nag the rest of the ilk like you who redirect attention to parasocial blabber, whether shamelessly or in the self-deluded way you currently are while pretending to be justified by mention of the meta.

To build from my last point, there's no difference between someone who pollutes the post count with unironic simping and someone who complains about those being simped for.
Make better posts, tell better jokes, learn to laugh/cry along or get started on the next great manifesto.

>>81631940
A single tear dropped down my leg after reading xis(NTA)

>>81631949
That's all? Must be dehydrated.

What will your additional tribute be to make up for this lousy yield?

>>81631975
I will only tribute if you post 2hu pics (W faps)
...oh and umm MBTI too haha... We need jungiankino or however it goes...

>>81628179
Someone doesn't know very much about functions or attitudes. Extroverted feeling is the function of harmony, to put it into layman's terms. It's mostly about aligning external emotional norms, values, group cohesion, etc. It is literally the last contrarian function of them all.
Now, of course, Fe types can still be contrarian because they've aligned with another group which is opposed to the status quo.

But, the main thing to take away from this is that Fe is the function of harmonious alignment with the external worlds feelings and emotions.
And there is an argument to be made that inferior Fe is actually the most contrarian.

>>81631949
one of the sexiest mbti posts I ever read

>>81631940
>You're not important enough to cause anyone to want to fool you. You're just mistaking and projecting your own fervent search for your favorite or most hateboner-worthy posters and some potential ability to spot---or convince yourself you've spotted---them as covert efforts on their parts to fine-tune and better disguise their circlejerks.
>If you want to nag someone, nag the rest of the ilk like you who redirect attention to parasocial blabber, whether shamelessly or in the self-deluded way you currently are while pretending to be justified by mention of the meta.

>To build from my last point, there's no difference between someone who pollutes the post count with unironic simping and someone who complains about those being simped for.
>Make better posts, tell better jokes, learn to laugh/cry along or get started on the next great manifesto.

don't be mean

>>81623129 (OP)
>>Your Type
ESFP-T
>>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
No, but sometimes reading these threads feels like a simulation.
>>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
No, the ghosts scare them away.
>>what color and style are your underwear
At the moment, canary yellow bikini cut.
>>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
I think the world needs different personality types.

Got my heart broken.
Types for this feel? Well?

>>81623129 (OP)
>>Your Type
INTJ
>>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
It's a livestream.
>>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
The walls are louder.
>>what color and style are your underwear
Schrodinger's cat style and color.
>>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
I'd prefer ISFJs, because it'd be a most surreal world. I don't care about alternatives.

>>81633986
>>>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
>No, but sometimes reading these threads feels like a simulation
Well said!!

>>81631998
>...oh and umm MBTI too haha... We need jungiankino or however it goes...
Thread's off to a good start!!

>>81625417
>I would channel the archetypal power of the universes collective unconscious, convene with the ghost of dead Jung from this universe, ask him to Bridge me to God, and request that God destroy this hypothetical universe for being psychologically unbalanced and simply grotesque.
Everyone's an ESTP, so you may start now.

>>81634087
How did you get your heart broken? Who broke it?

WHO DID THIS TO YOU, PATCH?

revenge for patch gang where we at?

tell who it was, and they will be sorry

>>81634087
>Got my heart broken
bby..... what happened

>patchy heart broken
nows my chance at patchy feet heaven

>>81634087
>Got my heart broken.
*hug*
I'm sorry to hear that. : (

>>81634087
>Everyone's an ESTP, so you may start now.
You're a day late and a dollar short. I have already mythologized the transcendent function into a magical transcendental state and channeled the archetypical power of the psyche to convene with the larger collective unconscious outside of the human psyche to tap into the raw un-un-conscious of the deceased Jung who resides in the psycho-aether.
I unlocked the magical doors which exist as liminal spaces between the here and the now and the now and the here, the thresholds that oscillate at unknown frequencies, forbidden by the God's of time to be witnessed by the ego bound minds.
I have found the root of all archetypes and the root of all roots, I looked into its rooty eyes as they morphed into mirrors of mirrors, reflecting symbols that reflected symbols that reflected me.
And in that moment, I understood, as the archetypal energies of Jung himself bellowed out a laugh which echoed across the aether like a rock dropped into the still waters of the psyche.

It's one grand illusion,
A joke,
Of which you are the butt.
A plays second act, which paradoxically, begins at the end.
Like a flashback to prelude of the opening act.

>>81634087
im sorry to hear that. you dont deserve it unlike that bitch l*lac

>>81634464
>nows my chance at patchy feet heaven
Motherfucker are you for real? I called those things 10 threads ago

>>81633986
Tell your friends to play night reign with you. : )

We're destined to fight to the death
So I try to get close just to feel your last breath
My justice swift in a moment you'll be gone
and I can't wait until you respawn...

>>81634809
>Tell your friends to play night reign with you. : )
Odd that they went with 3 player. 4 has become pretty standard for co-op games.

>>81634464
Okay, you can have everything from the ankle up and from the neck down, minus her heart. I get the good parts, like her beautiful mind. You can be her body boyfriend, and I'll be her mind, heart, and foot boyfriend. There's no leeway on this so be prepared to fight over her if this isn't acceptable

>>81634910
That's what the chair in the corner is for.

>>81634927
This is some cuck shit, go back to your cuck shed fag.

>>81635164
All I need is an off-grid cuck shed in the woods away from the government and with patch feet and i'm good living a simple life. enjoy your busted society and trying to uphold a sense of masculinity you'll never live up to

>>81634979
>That's what the chair in the corner is for.
I was wondering.

>>81635232
>>81635211
2 Confirmed cucks itt
Why would Jung do this?

>>81635241
Jung knew about the hidden cuck function below the shadow that was integral to individuation, but decided not to write about it because he knew it would just lead to people doing cuck work and trying to integrate. You have to read the secret Jung apochrypha for the good knowledge

Remember that time Jung cucked his wife by sleeping with his first patient. I kinda wanna become a therapist just so I can have sex with wild crazy mental ills

>>81635693
you can't blame a motherfucker for being on his integration grindset

Obv that was to fix his patient

oh, yeah . . .
of course
benevolent jung the selfless healer getting his dicky wet for her benefit

>>81631940
calm down bro lol

U jus mad that you can't fix patients

PUT ON THE GLOVES WE'RE SPARING NOW I"M GONNA KNOCK YOU OUT Y'A DUNCE

I got the glove on my dick bouta fix you up real good

>>81635551
Thank you.
Ahem! Does anyone want to fuck my gf? I doing Cuck Work to become a better individual.

sometime i feel like a block of cheese like do you know what i mean? is that a normal thing to feel like depending on the situation

does anyone know where i can get one of these

>>81636912
as in you feel like a tasty snack stuffed with medication?

>name a regular or multiple regs
>If they were a block of cheese, how would you use them in a meal? What would you make? How would you eat them?
Serious answers only . . .

>>81637586
you first dummy

>>81637586
>Rxy
Brie de Meaux, enjoyed with a glass of 2019 Chateau St. Jean Cabernet Franc. On a picnic blanket under a nicely shaded oak tree in the park. To be savored, cherished, and remembered

>Lilac
A Kroger slice of American cheese sandwiched between wonder bread and put in the microwave for too many seconds and then called grilled cheese. To be thrown in the trash

>Sophia
Parmesan cheese for fettuccine alfredo using whipped cream from the cows on her ranch. To be a filling and satisfying meal

>>81637737
I did, I did.
Now (you)

>>81637808
>Patchy anon
Cheddar cheese. Not to be consumed, because that would mean she's gone. I'd just lick her all day

Meanwhile the cows on sophia's ranch
>>81637793

>>81637886
>>81636962
oops these are the cows on sophia's ranch

>>81637586
>>81637793
i was going to restrain myself but this development means i am now obligated to share the revelation that vaughn from DE looks like (canon) kris. i don't decide the tides of fate i only foresee them

>down to the lefthand side behind the ear charm braid
property value independent fixed rate iykwim btw. taiga really is the literallyest you jej

>>81637911
Can't be me because he still has hair.
On point tho otherwise

>>81637793
>A Kroger slice of American cheese sandwiched between wonder bread and put in the microwave for too many seconds and then called grilled cheese.
Tastes like home.

>>81638110
>Tastes like home.
lol my mother used to make them like that

I'm really hungry for some lilac sandwich

>>81637586
I would eat Turbie if she were a cheese.
I think Turbie would be a soft cute cheese, like a babybel except with a bit more fruity notes and a pink shell instead of a red shell and you open her up and gobble her up and then you have to go in for another and another and then at the end you can pile up all the pink shells and combine them into a big turbie!!! ^_^

>>81638110
>Tastes like home.
Seconded. Anon meant that as an insult, but it's made me veery hungry.

I just made a microwave grilled cheese in honor of lilacussy

i want a ghetto ass lilac sandwich with extra weed and lsd for extra schizophreniamaxx

Ahem,
That's not schizomaxxin'
That's archetypal possession by the trickster
The Trickster with a blister
So small that you missed 'er
As she went passin'
Bye, she said,
Enjoy your ego's casket
Sucked down to the depths and wrapped in plastic

guys no they're for the trash you're not supposed to want one lmao

>>81638550
oh lillithlac, never change

>>81638475
>ywn spend the day having a picnic with lilac at beach with her homemade turkey sandwiches with hot chips in them

>>81638567
One man's trash is my special treasure

>>81638550
>archetypal possession by the trickster
you don't even know what my trickster function is

>>81638574
You little shit you,
I'm not Purple.
I'm just someone who
has integrated the circle.
And gone beyond the mind
And surpassed time
Only to find
sex lmao xDDD

>>81638598
>dry sandwich on the beach
This sounds like hell

>>81638645
>forgetting about the lilac lemonade special to wash it down

>>81638475
get the fuck out of here tik tok kid
ldar truecel

>>81638630
That's because the trickster function is memeology. Made up nonsense to fool you into thinking you know what is being said. Just a misdirect,
Oh, look over there! A shiny object!

one mans intjfemboi is another mans lilac

deep thought on that one anon

>>81638550
Just so the rest of the thread knows, yes, this is Lilac. That is all.

Purple would be amused by my LARPuple.

>>81638829
everyone who enjoys this series is demon possessed

>>81638685
lilac sneed me some of that lilac lemonade special make it extra stinky spice

>>81638843
That's a silly perspective which lacks nuance.

Nuance is unnecessary when dealing with the Devil.
dude is wicked and has no good in him at all, as is all who follow in his wake

>>81634087
>Got my heart broken.
I'm incredibly sorry to hear that. I've been there too.

>>81638909
>dude is wicked and has no good in him at all, as is all who follow in his wake
Maybe that's why INFJ-A likes him?

>>81638958
Maybe that's why INFJ-A Is a homosexual

The devil is Lucifer,
The bringer of light.
Vision comes at a cost.

>>81638645
>This sounds like hell
For you, maybe; sounds like bliss to me.

I'm all for lilac shadow jabs, but what exactly is the problem with a dry sandwich at the beach?

I don't like sand, I don't like beach. >_.<
I don't like sand in my turkey drywich.
I'd rather starve

>>81639017
That person only thinks of eating a dry sandwich and his thoughts end. He does not take it a step further and think of what else one might bring to a picnic. Such as drinks and snacks, but lilac is the snack.

A dry sandwich
On a wet beach
Sounds like~
Perfect harmony.

>>81638975
Satanas is not Lucifer
In the Bible there are two different lights, the Light of Yah and his Son or the Light of the Devil who came disguised as the angel of light.
You're going to be following one of these two lucifers no matter what. Which one you're following is up to you.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9UBtAa5A4pCAFwUNfbJsYbwFfsovKiHh

How are you managing to get sand in it? Like the fuck??? Are you a slob? How does this happen?

You know what, forget it. It was lilac shaded and that's good enough for me

>>81639042
dropped the ball not using lisnack there, anon . . .

I assumed that the lemonade was lilac's pee and that we would get over the dry turkey sandwich by drinking her piss

ai ass thread

I really hate beaches though fr. You have to be half naked, there are lots of other people around, the sand is icky on my feet and gets all over, the birds are gross. It is one of the last places I would ever want to go

>>81639074
sand is just flying around all over the air when you're at the beach how can you have a picnic there and not get sand in your food? It's just like if you had a picnic at a forest you would get ants in it;... ICK ick ick
It's better to eat at a table

God damn, Anon really dislikes the beach lmao. I've never seen such beach hatred before

>>81639064
Uhm, Satan is the fallen angel, Lucifer.
Real believers know that the word of God is not so simple to say that the devil is a purely evil force. He's merely a split off, repressed aspect of the divine totality.

Oh Shit, I said Real that Means anon is going To Come out of the Woodwork and accuse me of "Not a real Scotsmanning"

>>81639183
>uhm
i just posted a whole serious.
"Lucifer" means light bearer.
You surely are aware that it is only found in the Bible 1 time. It comes from Latin. AKA is a church consideration.
>Oh no I caught my own logical fallacy
At least you're aware of your folly, maybe try not doing that?

The Adversary is not "merely a split off" this is a Free Masonic conception of Our Father which is NOT the truth. The Devil existed before the creation of this Heaven and Earth, he rebelled when he was to worship the humans because he thought he was better since he was made of fire instead of Mud, he took 1/3rd of the angels with him and Make war with the Remnants to this day.
He is not an aspect of the Father, he is the Adversary. The Light has NOTHING to do with the darkness, and that fallen angel who used to be a covering of the Most High is not that any longer.

>>81639196
lol your ego is still wounded on that one

>>81639114
I assumed that the lemonade was lilac's pee and that we would get over the dry turkey sandwich by drinking her piss. After that debacle I questioned the atmosphere at around 9:30. There was a lisp in the air. I couldn't quite tell where we were, but we managed ok.

>cuck fetishes
>what cheese is each reg
>unhinged beach racism
>religion debate now brewing
Jesus Christ could you guys make the thread any worse?

modern men and women love beaches, but don't want to have children
Flaming homosexuals, I hope they all get pooped on by seagulls

3
2
1

https://strawpoll.com/eJnvVNqJMnv

Disdain for the beach is not "racism". It's just objectively a bad place to go.

>>81639232
You literally made my point right here:
>he Devil existed before the creation of this Heaven and Earth
Which means, the Devil was divine, and then he:
>rebelled when he was to worship the humans

You quite literally said: "No, you're wrong, let me say the same exact thing you did, though."

The devil, aka Lucifer showed the light to the humans and gave them the knowledge of good and evil. This is why the devil has the name Lucifer.
>>81639280
No, I was actually mocking the people who do that. The nuance in their head as the texture of a polished river stone, smooth, featureless and entirely useless to conduct thought.

it says here Harambe just voted for INTJfemboi as the utlimate cuckoldress. interesting

TIED UP

>>81639406
>Which means, the Devil was divine,
What does divinity mean to you?
The devil is a spirit, he isn't the Lord Almighty.
He's a fraudster and a trickster.
He is not of the Father, when the gates to the Kingdom Close he will be sealed away in eternal fire.

I didn't say "You are wrong", But you are trying to conflict and fight. You didn't watch the playlist on this very topic, you just want me to trust you when you're a nigger devil bitch, worshipping the Devil.

>>81639394
>It's just objectively a bad place to go.
Perhaps black beaches

>>81639406
>The devil, aka Lucifer showed the light to the humans and gave them the knowledge of good and evil.
Here you are Worshipping the Devil.
>Look he did good he had us eat the apple
>see God lied everything is alright
Meanwhile NIGGERS ARE DYING BECAUSE OF YOUR DEVIL DECISION
FUCK YOU FOID
ENJOY YOUR MENSTRAUL CRAMPS AND MAY YOU HAVE GREAT LABOR PAINS

>>81639406
>No, I was actually mocking the people who do that. The nuance in their head as the texture of a polished river stone, smooth, featureless and entirely useless to conduct thought.
Ah so you got called out before by someone and you've been left eternally assblasted
Lmao

>>81639413
>>81639426
Big Dick Daddy from Cincinnati voted for lilick. That must be her bull

>>81639390
is a cuckoldress a cheater or the person cheated on

>>81639406
>No, I was actually mocking the people who do that.
Mocker Scoffer.
DEMON POSSESSED BITCH
You are getting LIT UP by the DEVIL
That is NOT the Light of the Lord, but the Light of your Lord the DEVIL
REPENT OF THE EVIL ONE

>>81639476
the one cucking the partner

>>81639476
Cuckoldry isn't technically cheating
A cuck is the man in the chair
A cuckoldress is the woman fucking the black

all cuckshit is the absolute worse.
ya'll should take a gun and blast your brains out because what you're teaching others to do when you promote your cuck shit will be on your hands and your judgment will be BRVTAL

Jesus God we've circled back to the cuck fetish bullshit. What's next, what flavor ice cream is your favorite reg?

>>81639428
Me:
"Satan and Lucifer are the same person."
You:
"No, Satan and Lucifer are not the same person."
Also you:
"I didn't say you're wrong."
Don't lie to me when I have the thread right in front of my face and can read what you said.

>What does divinity mean to you?
The devil existed alongside God. The Devil, God, and his angels were equals. God is not entirely good. God is comprised of all things, both good AND evil. The Devil is merely God's shadow, his repressed aspects which were cast into the pits of the unconscious. Where they transformed into a snake, the archetypal representation of the trickster and acted through projection and possession.
>and a trickster.
You got one thing right.

If you think God is all good, you're a fool. And that is EXACTLY what Satan was proving by telling Adam and Eve to eat from the tree. God is the one who created evil, therefore, evil is within God himself.
It's just an echo the psyche.
>>81639458
Lmao yeah it's pretty funny that they say the same thing every time I say the word "real". That's why I made fun of them.

Jeez Laweez are we gonna talk about this Dang cuck shit any more? I'm playing Spiderman-2 rn.

>>81639526
More like BVLLTAL amiright

>>81639553
>The Devil, God, and his angels were equals.
WRONG
THis is FALSE TEACHING
OF SATANIC MASONIC FAGGOTS
where did you learn this?
Bohemian Grove
FUCK YOU AND YOUR DEVIL

>>81639553
>don't lie when I have the thread right there
>paraphrase my message and writes lies when the thread is right there
Satanists will piss on your leg and tell you it's raining. End yourself.

>>81639553
>The Devil is merely God's shadow, his repressed aspects which were cast into the pits of the unconscious.
Where were you when the Most High lain the foundations of the Earth?
Where did you get this "knowledge"?
you got it from the DEVIL

>>81639577
I got it from the bible itself. God himself crated light AND dark, good AND evil.
Even if you subscribe to the notion that God is all powerful, and all everything-ing. That encompasses evil.
If he is all powerful, he has the power to do evil. Because all is half good and half evil. He can't be all powerful if he lacks evil. Then he's only half powerful.

Check mate.
>>81639604
I'm not a Stanist.

Lmao this guy is getting wrecked

There is no Equal to Our Father.
HE created the Heavens and the Earth.
HE established the Sun and the Stars
HE Breathed his life into us
Not He and His buddy the Devil.

Isaiah 45
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.

Evil comes directly from God. Which means.
Evil is within God.
Which means.
The devil is part of God.
Which means...
You guessed it,
The Devil is equal to God.
Just like the unconscious shadow is equal to the self.

Check.
And
Mate.

>I'm not a satanist
Meanwhile you're bowing down the Devil and following the False light.
Get away from me Demon.
Go enjoy your dry ass sandwich on your filthy crack infested beach. I hope you get sand in your asshole.

You worship a false, idolized God.
Just read the book of Job.
Is that the work of an all good God?
No.
No it is not.
[red]An all good God would not punish Job through the hands of Satan himself.[/red]

Lmao you didn't even read it correctly
DUMPASS
LOLOLOL

>>81639687
THE MOST HIGH IS NOT HIS CREATION.
If I go build a birdhouse I am not a Birdhouse nor is the birdhouse me.

>>81639659
>The Devil is equal to God.
This right here.
Is exactly why the Devil was cast out of Heaven.
This Right here is why you're a Satanist.
Repent.

I feel like MBTI is peaking right now

The only additional things we need are dumpster fires and a cracked out lilac squatting over some cardboard tweaking . . .

>>81639705
But the birdhouse came from within you.
The birdhouse was a part of you, and still is.
You cannot create something you don't have the ability to create.
If God can create evil, then he has the capability of evil.
Which means he's not all good.
>>81639716
I mean, this comes straight from the bible itself, you know. God has no qualms with saying he is entirely capable of evil. That's what the book of Job is all about.

If God is all powerful,
God has the power to commit evil.

>>81639758
>God has the power to commit evil.
The ability, not the desire

You are now shifting the argument trying to talk about the nature of the Most High when you won't even acknowledge that He is the Most High. You're conflating him with the DEVIL. God did not do Evil when he tested Job.

He is Light; in him there is no darkness at all. He always walks in accordance with what is right and true and good. Just as Christ Yeshua did. There is nothing unpleasant, evil, or dark in Him. His Love endures forever. Unlike the Devil who lies and cheats and steals and only knows how to do wrong.

When you conflate the DEVIL with God, you are saying that the Adversary and the Father are the same person, but this is not True.

>>81639796
>You are now shifting the argument
What else would you expect from someone who demonstrates a misunderstanding of basic fallacy like no true Scotsman?

>>81639815
I expect him to take a bullet to his temple

>>81639820
>I expect him to take a bullet to his temple
Lmao based. He is a heretic

>>81639545
My favorite reg is RUBY CHOCOLATE flavor ice cream!! YUM

>>81639337
If Jung were Alive today would he support LGBT

>>81639778
A perfect characterization of the shadow.
Doing something you don't want to do.
>>81639796
I have not shifted anything, you just cannot wrap your feeble mind around the totality of the point I am making.
>in him there is no darkness at all.
BZZT! Wrong. God created darkness as well as light. God created evil, as well as good. ALL of these things are within him.

God punished Job for no reason. That is evil. God must do evil, because that is the balance. It's not that God desires to do evil. He must. Evil must happen, lest good itself would disappear.
You worship a false, one-sided God. Similar to thinking your ego is the totality of your Self. An image of yourself that is characterized only by the traits you want to acknowledge.
God is not the opposite of evil.
God is ALL.
Evil is part of all.
God is evil.
God is the Devil because the Devil is evil.
It's just an aspect of God.
A part.

>>81639839
I said that, but I feel bad about it.
I don't want anyone to murder themselves, it's better that they just repent and follow the Light of the Lord most High

>>81639890
>God punished Job for no reason. That is evil.
You are in no position to judge our Creator and that you think you are in the position to Judge our creator shows me that you are a satanist.
I urge you to repent.

I will not repent for knowing the truth.
God is not one-sided.
He is not all good.
God is all.
Which includes evil.

You cannot refute this point,
Without retracting the presupposition that God is all powerful.
Because all includes evil.

>>81639890
Dude you're getting blown out but you're too stupid to realize it

>>81639907
God is both all and all good. You don't have the mind to comprehend Truths like that

>Dude you're getting blown
UGNN MY DICK
KEEP BLOWING IT YOU SLUT

How many guys has lilac blown

Someone is coming who is greater than I, So much greater that I am unworthy to even be his slave and untie his shoes. He will bring to you the Holy Spirit and baptize with fire. He is ready to separate the chaff from the wheat. He will clean up the whole world, gather the wheat into his barn, but the chaff will be burned in never-ending fire.

>>81639926
That is not a truth.
God is all.
All good.
And all evil.
God is everything.
Everything includes everything.

>>81639956
18 year old taking shrooms for the first time type understanding of the Lord

>>81639971
It's okay little fella, I know you have a limited understanding.

>>81639986
i know you're a demon possessed faggot

>>81639941
She is a spiritual mentalist. Any pleasure she would give would always be to your mind and spirt, never your physical because that is too low vibrational.

>>81639988
as you can see the numbers don't lie

>>81639988
You are the one possessed by demons and projecting their rage.
I am enlightened and know the truth.
You are stuck in the dark ages of your own shadow.

>>81639390
this is a combination of sluttiness levels + morality levels

you can be high in the former but not cheat because you're also high in the latter

>>81639941
probably like around 8-9

>>81639994
That's why she only pegs and never receives

Guys we are never going to attract more infj girls into this thread if you all keep acting like this

>>81640313
why would we even want infj girls here

>>81640324
Infj girls smell pretty and dress cutest

>>81640324
What are you gay? What girls do you want attracted to this thread?

>>81640345
INTP girls > INFJ girls in every way

>>81623129 (OP)
holy shit typology on 4chan

i am going to completely ignore that this prompt was made using MBTI and instead answer with jungian

>Your Type
ES(F)
>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
Something similar to but not strong enough, yes. archaic intuition doing shit
>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
Nah
>what color and style are your underwear
...peculiar question. plain old boxers, black
>>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
ES(T) best, EF(N) worst

172.240.53.63:2155

/MBTI-CRAFT/

LATEST VERSION

Dude, I'm right here. You don't need to pretend to be me antagonizing you to simulate talking to me. Just get over the "I have never claimed to be an authority on anything except, conveniently, the faultless diagnosis of the pathology of anyone who has ever rejected me and/or called me on my patterns" feigned humility thing and 1v1 me in a battle of conditional adherence to theory depending on when it stops being based so it doesn't skirt derail territory.

Besides, no one can compete with the Eternal Whippersnapper in THAT regard.

>>81639114
>kinda is, kinda isn't
>>k i n d a i s, k i n d a i s n ' t
>>>K I N D A I S, K I N D A I S N ' T

tell larry the lobster to join already

>>81640640
https://voca.ro/18fIQrewsxZH

>>81626536

Based typology nerd mentality

>>81640357
Are you an intp girl?

>>81640640
>Dude, I'm right here
https://youtu.be/aSvOozNo69M?si=Qal9sStjRqKXz0r6

>>81640357
>INTP girls > INFJ girls in every way
So much this. NT thinkers mog NF stinkers all day every day

I wish a NT girl would fix me ..

so kris you would marry sophie if she was an intp girl?

>>81640949
We were married and divorced, where do you think I posted that pic from? It's me on her farm several years ago taking a selfie when I knew it was so over between us, that's why I have the sad pensive look

I would marry an NT stinker, but it's the NF flower who really needs love <333 plus I'm already komda married to turbie ^_^

>>81641111
Checked. Well, you're an NT so it makes sense that an NF like turbie is perfect for you. NTs and NFs go together. Ying to the Yang. NTs and NTs, and NFs and NFs, go together less well with each other. You don't want two yangs or two yings

which reggie is most likely to have a stinky bus >w<

these two are made for each other arent they

>>81623129 (OP)
are you an INFJ?

>>81641111
omg!! nice numbers

>>81641378
>>81641378
>omg!! nice numbers
Yesss!! Quads!!! ^_^ WOW

>>81641140
Wow Did you know this chat///
nfs and nts were literally made for eachother!!!

Don't braindamage your person
Remember give Patchy patch a hug (>^_^)><(^_^<) mwah patchy patchy

>>81637586
If patchy were a cheese patchy would be romano and i would grind them over lasagna.... i-is that rape?

>Your Type
infp
>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
multiple, im diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder
>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
no but i have tactile hallucinations that feel like bugs crawling in my mouth and throat
>what color and style are your underwear
pink boyshorts
>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
i dont know enough about mbti for this i just wanted to spread my r9k seed and force people to read my posts

>>81641811
>pink boyshorts
owo

Good night mbti! zzxz
back again some other time ;-;
make sure to take your night time magneisum

>>81639074
>How are you managing to get sand in it?
I've heard that it "gets everywhere".

God I hate you people.

>the ol double reverse will really throw em for a loop

..
https://youtu.be/8hfkLg9Ax_Q

>Your type
>How secure do you feel in your reggy sexing? Do you think XDDDD will be automated by 2030?

>>81640949
As Kris said, we were married for a while, but he left me for Breeder. That's where he got his love for INTP girls.

>>81634087
What would be surreal about a world filled with ISFJs? I hope you feel okay soon.

>>81636947
idk what is that

gfoid says I "don't have a time-management problem but a time-management-problem"
and that I am weird for listening to this while lifting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXpYoxik15g&list=RDYXpYoxik15g&start_radio=1

what type am does that make me?

Sex lmao xDD

nice bump, addict

>>81643057
>As Kris said, we were married for a while, but he left me for Breeder
umm..... kris is this true?

>>81642801
Heavenly Father
I love all these people
Let them each find their person and get pregnant

Oh father, heavenly and dark
Bring down upon them the holiest of chaos and uncertainty
That they may may drown
And in drowning, find the holiest ground beneath the flood.
Let them walk through ruin,
That they may be remade in the forge

>>81630634
Yes, it is actually wokepilled because the blatantly obvious is often overlooked because it is seen as being "Boring", like the IIEE/EEII focus in favor of whatever schizo nonsense the socionics/mbti team came up with. I can see why you are frustrated with my post though, but I am well aware of these things. I am like the last person to say that having a dominant function means you're actually good at it
>>81632135
Explain r/redscarepod then? That place is extremely Fe and yet it's also perpetually contrarian. Maybe contrarianism for it's own sake is both Ti and Fe Inferior.

how the fuck do you cope as a 4w3?

>>81647297
Make your own reality through autistic cartoon creations like chris chan

>>81630634
So all types are just as talented at everything as anyone else. Then why even choose to be a certain mbti then if there's no advantages?

I can't really tell if I'm 5w4 or 5w6, maybe I just have balanced wings

Make your own reality through artificial T-girl pregnancies so Sophie can finally be bred

Sophie is gonna marry an INTP girl and get her pregnant!! ^_^

are you trying to piss me off or what

pregnant sophie would be beautiful >w<

Create your own reality and don't wait for happiness
It is only by creating that that that that that that that joy that you can be in the zone

>your type
>would you marry and impregnate sophie?

>>81648043
entp
no but he'd make a good friend

>>81647278
>Explain r/redscarepod then?
Explain what? It's just a political place. You can't associate functions or types with political beliefs. Doesn't make sense.
>That place is extremely Fe
No idea where you're getting that from.

>>81647830
I've done LSD in my lifetime.

>>81647679
nta but what do you mean choose?

You don't really choose your primary function just whichever one you default to is your primary function

>>81648358
>he believes it's Random

>>81648377
uhm sweaty, I think Our Father crafted us to be like we are. There is no randomness in this world everything is designed by the Most High

>>81648358
You do choose your primary function. The dominant function is the one the ego identifies with. It's the function the ego builds its sense of self around. It's not about whether or not you default to it. Because defaulting is more of an unconscious bias. It's about what you consciously lean into and defend as "yourself".
Some aspects of your psyche you call "not me" and some aspects of your psyche you call "me". That is to say, some of the stuff in your head happens to you, and some of it you create consciously.
The dominant function falls into the realm of "you create consciously" and the inferior function "happens to you".

You need some Jung in your life, and to stop consuming pop culture slop.

You need the Lord in your life and Jung isn't He.
Stop relying on man and rely on the Most High.

The one true lord is in my life.
The Lord of All.
Both good and evil,
Light and darkness.
Not your false idol,
Your false, split face god.
But, the whole,
The terribly divine.
The bringer of all,
The holiest of holies.
The bridge between dark
And light.

He who represses the darkness of God
Lives in his own shadow.
Afraid to confront the darkness within himself.
Seek God, and love your shadow.
As He loves you.

>>81649045
INFJ-a you are not a brother in Christ.
I wish you were but you're not. You just want to cause chaos and strife. I wouldn't even be surprised if you were isfp sophie hater.

God is not Darkness.
You are demon possessed.
Repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand.

>>81649045
>not your false split god
Meanwhile
>my god has two egos dark and light
A double minded man is unstable in all His ways. Repent

>>81649075
He's not ISFP Sophie Hater, though he was the short-lived Turbie Hater meme account.

>>81649075
Within God is contained darkness,
For without God,
There would not be darkness,
because there would not be light.

God.
Is.
All.
Keep your cherrypicked God away from me,
You who blaspheme the wholeness of the divine.
God is wholeness.
God is not absent from the dark.
>>81649092
No, it's the ego and the shadow.
My God, is not MY God. He is THE God. The God of ALL. Dark. Light. Evil. Good.
He is the God which makes the volcanoes erupt, and the who brings the cooling rains after.
He is the God who scrapes your knee when you fall.
And the God who makes it heal.
He is the God who burns your tongue on hot pizza.
But also the God who lets you taste its divine pizzaness.

>>81649075
>I wouldn't even be surprised if you were isfp sophie hater.
He is literally and unironically Sloggy47.

>>81648105
The whole point of that sub is the make commentary on various political/societal trends going on. The reason why I say it is Fe is because a lot of it is casting various sorts of well evaluations on the ethics and coolness of things more than say a more reasoned take on things.

>>81649236
You literally and unironically could not be more wrong.

>>81649155
You said in this Thread.
That the Devil IS God.
You don't ever use His Name YHWH you always use the Babylonian Fortune Idol "God"
You don't talk about the Blessings of Christ, you Don't keep the commandments of our Lord.
You in this manner, are a worker of Satanas, you are a host of the adversary, the Devil.
The Devil is Not omnipotent, the Devil is Not Omniscient, the Devil is not Omnipresent, the Devil is Not Divine.
You need to repent of this blasphemy if you are a true believer in the Mashiach Yeshua, Christ Jesus.

Is Christ Jesus Host of the Devil? Did he Live a sinless life? Was he born of a Virgin? Was he Crucified for your Sins?
If your answer to any of these is that the Son is a part of the Devil and a worker of Evil; then it's clear that you are a liar and of your Father the Devil.
Not of Our Father the Lord Almighty Creator of Heaven and Earth

>>81649121
Turbie Hater was INFJ-A's alt/meme account.

I will never forgive INFJ-A for hating Turbie unless he apologizes and gets baptized.

Turbie Enjoyer have you heard of Albert Pike's WW3 prediction?

I will never be baptized because I don't believe in your false idol god.

>>81649573
I have seen the predictions before, some claim it is a forgery.
Same with the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Fake or Not, they have closely followed what happened! and all of this false doctrine is of the Devil.
"Illumination" from the Illuminati is that False Lucifer.

I was watching Eurovision last cycle and look at this song it is straight up Satanism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btHmbxrgbb8
Dude thinks he doesn't need a saviour, that he is is OWN illumination, his OWN lighter, all of the illuminati process follows this same train of thought. To these people their candle stands have been taken from them, and will get caught up inside that WW3. He who runs are playing a massive war games, both Spiritually and in the Flesh.

Please Stay out of Military Service, Please do not Die for or against Israel.
Avoid a draft, find your person, have a family, flee from fornication, and worship the Living God, so that you may drink from the Rivers of Life.

>>81649820
No surprise there, you're filthy.
If you repent I will baptize you myself if you'd like

>>81649839
W post

>>81647660
that doesn't help, I would still be jealous of others' creations who are better than mine

>>81649075
God praises me everyday for doing my best to hate s*phie

I CAN'T GET CAPTCHAS ANYMORE AAAAAAAA
4chan is le kill

fuck sophie
fuck kris
fuck turbie enjoyer
and most of all'
fuck turbie

Be nice to turbie >:(

>>81650208
Based Turbie Hater

hating turbie is natural and what every person should aspire to do. hating sophie is unnatural and only something satan-worshippers aspire to do.

There is never a good reason to hate Turbie. She has never been mean to anyone in her whole life

>>81650510
how can you read a turbie post without wanting to gargle shit. so obviously a fake person. at least sophie is nice sweet and motherly

Let's be real here, they're both equally fake.

its prtty ez to break sophies facade of a persona too

How horrible it will be for the wicked! For the rewards of his sins shall be given unto him.

Turbie is not fake she recently said me and she were kinda married ^w^ I love her!! ^w^

are you really who you proclaim to be

>>81650603
>>81650649
I don't think either of us are really fake. Turbie's personality is curated but he means what he says. As for me, "Mean when angry/on the defensive, not mean when neither one" is pretty normal and not related to fakeness.

>>81650750
Turbie is a girl don't call him he ;-; she is gonna be my wife and babooboobo

>>81650750
>Personas aren't fake, I tell you!
I mean, come on. They're quite literally masks. At least I can give you props for being real sometimes, and dropping the facade. Turbie, on the other hand, is a mega curated persona. It never stops pretending. You never see the person behind the mask, it's just fake cute fluff.
If you're only willing to show the aspects of yourself that you think other people will find acceptable simply so they will like you, that's the epitome of fake.

>>81650970
banger post

Turbie's actual self is just a soft cupcake who wants to help the world, but is scared D:

I don't think she curates or puts on a mask but is just her own scared self who is like a schizoid paranoid because she is afraid people won't like her, but she is actually a smol little cupcake inside and out!!! BE nice T_T Sophie just mad cause Turbie is on team Sophie is a boy T_T

Also she looks 14 ever since her new haircut T_T
>>81432988

The real worry is not that Turbie won't be enjoyed but that she won't enjoy me!! WHat if her mask is that she actually hates me and wants me to die but doesn't tell me that because it would hurt my feelings ;-; so she just lies about love me and send hearts? That is what you want me to believe?? T_T how evil you is... i'm gonna have a meltie ;-;

>>81650970
Guilty as charged then, can't argue if that's the definition being used.

>>81651098
Absolutely zero percent chance of Turbie hating you. Why would the girl who wants attention dislike the person who gives her the most of it?

>>81651109
Turbie said
>I try not to be racist ;-;
Which means she is racist when you take the mask off!! I love her !!! ^_^

Turbie Enjoyer on the left Turbie on the right

>>81651206
turbie is patchy patch and I've just been too retarded to notice? D: noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

>>81651206
kris on the left, intjfemboi on the right

>>81651206
apollo on the left, pumpkin on the right

Here is evidence that turbie isn't patchy patch, since look at these posts are within 30 seconds!

>>81651406
So what cryptos are you in bro? How has life been

>>81651406
>He doesn't know about phonepissing

Turbie would never hurt me like that

>>81651416
idk who you are, so I won't tell you any identifiable information about me or my wallets

>cute: turbie, turbie enjoyer, enfj-senpai, infj-a, mosley
>hot: lilac, kris, sophie, patchy, prince

Cute is a death sentence nooooooo

Ew don't call me CUTE!
I'M EVIL.
AND MEAN.

>>81651502
actually, there is a small hint in your words that lets me know you do in fact know.

Why read Jung when you can read Graham? Time wasted reading Jung is time spent not reading Graham.

>>81651815
could be anyone

>>81652294
What does Graham say, assume I only read the /mbti/ in your explanation

Just started squid games 3 omg isn't the cute pink bow adorable i want to put one in turbie's hair ^_^

could and INTJ have an INFJ alter ego?

Wow I watched the whole Squid Game Season 3.
time for bed. Good Night I hope I see turbie again and that she doesn't hate me ;-;

>>81623129 (OP)
Your Type
intp
>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
no
>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
no
>what color and style are your underwear
no pan
>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
assuming its a direct copy of current reality with all current infrastructure and inventions and stuff just that everyone's type switched to one and not one where this change is applied from the evolution of humans as a species as those have greatly different answers
best: intp
worst: esfj

Stfu bitches

just wanna fuck that infj girlie
pin her down and fuck her, because she needs it
pale pussy getting wet from how roughly she is being handled

>>81651678
nah just very boeing

shut up idjit

make me cuuuunt go get fucked boy

>>81623129 (OP)
>Your Type
INTP.
>Did you ever have a schizophrenic episode?
For someone to have a "schizophrenic episode," they would typically need to meet diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia. It's not a term usually used in isolation for a one-time event. What you probably mean is psychotic episode.
>Do you hear wall creatures that don't exist?
Sensationalizing an illness and misunderstanding clinical terms. As expected of a MBTI op.
>what color and style are your underwear
Not wearing any.
>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?
INFJ would probably be best. Long term planning, stability, empathetic.
ESTP would likely be worst. Impulsive, short-term focus.

>>81655712
Sexy post ngl

>>81655558
same, kris is rape bait

>>81655712
>infj
>Long term planning, stability,
Kek

>>81655716
*rapess you*

>>81655712
>INFJ would probably be best. Long term planning, stability, empathetic.
>ESTP would likely be worst. Impulsive, short-term focus.
Yuck pop culture takes.

>>81623129 (OP)

>Your type
INTP.

>If you were forced into an alternate reality where everyone was the same personality type what type would be the best and worst for this new world?

INTP. They're the most likely to be antinatlist and preserve the the right to die so hopefully society would stop existing shortly after it's magically created or at the very least progress at a pace that lets us take care of the fundamental concerns of living, suffering and dying before they get out of hand.

The worst would probably be ISFP. I have not seen much intelligence from this type. Everyone I've confirmed as ISFP has been very sensitive, biased, stubborn and aggressive, which encapsulates every facet of society that keeps it's citizens suffering. Their function stack is the most likely to make them how I described.

>>81656454
>which encapsulates every facet of society that keeps it's citizens suffering
completely wrong
ISFPs and society as a whole suffer because of psycopathic th*nkers in power
if everything was run by ISFPs the world would be beautiful

Antinatalism is peak Immaturity

>>81656636

The people with the most power in society, who are politicians and corporate owners, bank owners and their shareholders, even if all of them were 'psychopathic' don't have many business related moral decisions to make. They compete with eachother mostly in a microeconomy and aren't aware of the damage that might do to consumers because it isn't apparent, and relative to general trends consumers/voters show support for whatever political or economic system they're apart of. There isn't a league of villians controlling society, it's just capitalism giving incentive to compete with or bribe eachother. Most evil is domestic, and the result of contradictions between emotion and rational. I think ISFPs sit right at the highest average between being quick to moralize, leading with fi, and having the most contradictory logic, having one of the lowest iq of all types. So.

>if everything was run by ISFPs the world would be beautiful
No.

>>81657390
>There isn't a league of villians controlling society
Yeah just people getting themselves off by trying to get possessed by archetype of evil in their spare LARP time and gatherings.
It's irrational to claim that all people are rational, or that rational people are rational all the time. Lots of held power also feeds ego inflation, and ego inflation inevitably attracts archetype possession. Gives psychopathy results even in otherwise non-psychopaths. Just psychology facts. "Conspiracy theory schizos" gathering dirt may be wrong on the narratives around the gathered facts, but not about the basic gathered facts existing - just a bonus cross-check.

>>81657390
>aren't aware of the damage that might do to consumers because it isn't apparent
do you really believe these people are that dumb? because not being able to think about and analyze the effects whatever you do will have is extremely stupid and unprofessional
but of course the problem isn't that they're not aware of it, it's simply that they do not care, which is exactly what makes them psychopathic

>>81657265

Non-existence Isn't immature if there's nothing to lack maturity. Heyo! Maybe you should be an antinatlist too if you don't like immaturity. We're advocating for the end of it.

>>81657530
So your response to me addressing the fact that businessmen aren't using the vast majority of their power to intentionally destroy those bellow them is to tell me that there is a correlation between psychopathy and power? I didn't need to be reminded. I would rather examine what they do with their money which is easier to keep track of than their thoughts given I was just talking with anon about why the world is a bad place.

>>81657546
I think 'these people' are very intelligent actually to be able to keep track of large sums of money distributed in so many ways, but it really depends what your place is in the company, how involved you are, whether you'll notice corruption or see it as severe. You may be approving an automation shortcut that puts consumers at risk, or someone can be delegated to that who you just told to meet a deadline. You may be friends with people who work for the news trying to get your faulty product advertised, or someone can be delegated to that. You may back a politician to make laws that favor you, on matters that are not immediately worrying to you, because you don't know you inadvertently cut funding to a program an impoverished city needed, by getting the guy elected.

It is much more complicated than power bad.

>>81657785
so you're saying they're not just choosing only what will benefit themselves without caring about the damage it will cause to others despite being fully aware of it but they're simply ignorant little kids that have no idea of the detrimental consequences their actions will have? I am not so sure about that

>>81657785
The claim about interpretations of seeming intentions being representative of the facts beneath:
>the fact that businessmen aren't using the vast majority of their power to intentionally destroy those bellow them
had been refuted by appeal to existing principles and evidence.
There's no argument. "Don't suspect malice until you're stabbed into the face with accompaniment of monologues confirming malice" is incompatible with life, so I don't even want to think about it.

>>81657565
It's quite literally the definition of immature, you know. So is thinking that the entirety of humanity should disappear because of your own experience and brainwashing.

I think moids and foids should get together and be married and get pregnant!! ^_^

>>81657930
No I think you just don't understand what CEOs or especially, former CEOs working in an LLC or in a government office, are responsible for. If you're told the economy is great and that doesnt count starving people you don't question it because it's not your job. Generally the higher up you are the less aware you are of the details of your company.

>>81657974
Money doesn't appear from thin air, a papertrail is more credible than your psychological analysis. You cannot make up the damage our laws do --> politicians do --> CEOs do when that damage is reliant on money. You can make up nearly whatever you want about someone's mental state. What isnt functional is the contradiction between the mental state you described and the outcome. So no you didn't refute my argument lol, it's lacking. And will you talk normally?

>>81658087
>So is thinking that the entirety of humanity should disappear
This one I definitely agree with. They're usually the ones who are resentful that there are people who are enjoying their lives.

>>81657974
what are your favorite reggies?
genuinely curious

>>81658087

That's epic. I think immature is useful for a lot more than just being synonymous with antinatlism but if you want to define it that way have at it friendo.

>because of your own experience and brainwashing.

I don't know who you're describing or how you'd prove that but I guess we just have completely different standards. I don't based my phisophical positions off of personal attacks on people that I cannot even confirm. I don't need to because antinatalism is rational and obviously correct to me.

>>81658259
>base my philosophical*
Thought I used autocorrect, mb.

>>81658192
>Money doesn't appear from thin air, a papertrail is more credible than your psychological analysis
That is correct; I'm also speaking from my experience of digging up the paper trail rabbit holes on my own.
Yet just the common finale of running into the common endpoint of BlackRock et al. is as good as running into a blackbox. Psy-analysis outflanks such limits - by dissecting the observable human element behind the defences of the system.
>You can make up nearly whatever you want about someone's mental state
Not if you take shown behavioral facts as the basis.

>>81658221
Your curiosity is your problem.
Himeno, India, Turbie, boatgirl INTP, the umikekos. There are a few more I don't know how to name.

>>81658207
It's more that they're people with trauma they've never dealt with and let it control their life. Then they project their trauma onto the rest of planet.
>>81658259
There's much more to immaturity than antinatalism, but that doesn't change the fact that it is extremely immature and a blatant sign of a person who has refused to grow up and move on.
Yes, yes, it's extremely rational that the entire human race should disappear because you personally suffer.
Peak.
Immaturity.

>"suffering exists therefore it's better that humanity doesn't"
Absolute archetypal shadow possession.

Anime exists therefore it's better that humanity does

>>81658303
Okay then we we must disagree on what qualifies as evil. You do realize if a wealthy CEO or politician wanted they could exercise their power to specifically screw over consumers and voters instead of making a profit right? That is why I'm debating their intentionality, which is not to use their money to cause damage. Their money is for a profit and like you said to LARP. Are you saying that because 1% of their money goes to flying out to the virgin islands to taste 13 year old Indonesian slave pussy that the world is a bad place? Again this interjection that they are LARPing psychos is a detour from what I wanted to discuss with anon lol.

>>81658390
>sign of a person who has refused to grow up and move on.

If slavery was wrong at some point, I don't think such statements have a place in a serious discussion about whether or not the philosophy deciding an entire race of people should be opressed. If you don't care that's fine but then just say that, say 'my take on your position, which you haven't even explained to me yet, has nothing to do with it's accuracy.' Just like someone in the south would expect someone north of them to move on.

>Yes, yes, it's extremely rational that the entire human race should disappear because you personally suffer.

Who said that? Wasn't me.

>>81658537
>You do realize if a wealthy CEO or politician wanted they could exercise their power to specifically screw over consumers and voters instead of making a profit right?
Evil is independent of, but can co-opt: principles of management, principles of efficiency, principles of profits.

>That is why I'm debating their intentionality, which is not to use their money to cause damage.
Wasting money on big evil when you can make money and do even bigger evil over long time with efficient use and gain of resources for it is the efficient implementation of evil serving evil.

>Are you saying that because 1% of their money goes to flying out to the virgin islands to taste 13 year old Indonesian slave pussy that the world is a bad place?
Normalization and denial of phenomenon of CHOOSING to succumb to archetype of evil - that also has the consequences you've described - is why the world is leaning towards being unsavory.

>>81658672
>Wasting money on big evil
isn't sensible* when
>you can make money and do even bigger evil over long time with efficient use and gain of resources for it is the efficient implementation of evil serving evil.

No, wait... Whatever, the sentence is understandable enough.

>>81658689
I almost didn't notice Marissa about to crash the party.

>>81658672

Yeah I still don't know man, there are so many business decisions cooperations make that screw society at large over that if you replaced every ceo with a literal angel nothing would change due to competing interests except for that all those angels would get assassinated, lose half their resources or get taken over. Money is it's own archetype of evil at this point.

>>81658672
elegant, sweet, complex

Online retard debates and poors seething over money. Thread truly delivers

*thinks*

>>81658818
Money is a radioactive artifact that, when mentally mishandled, risks corroding your individuation cycles enough for the very patterns of archetype of evil to possibly seep in. People have a lot of endless explaining to themselves to do when they see capital as a target to delegate life to. This also works for any quantifiable units - such are the principles of cybernetics and psychology.
You're right that angels as CEOs et al. would fix nothing - since merely the angel behavior itself isn't a guarantee of competence that's needed just as much.

what intjfemboi lacks in terms of financial assets he makes up for in beauty and prose.

I'm being an ugly poor retard interrupting the Holy R*ggy Sex... Time to SH again...

(>^_^)><(^_^<) There there patchy patch, you're not ugly poor or retarded! You're rich in wealth and intellect.

>>81658985
you are NOT ugly

>>81658537
What in the world does slavery have to do with what we're talking about...?
Are you trying to say that we should murder all the slaves and their descendants because they were slaves?
And even though you haven't explained your position, if you did, you would say exactly what I've said. Just with different words.

The actual bad parts of the world are when you eat those canned fish from India and Thailand they are are able to make them so cheaply because they use 100% slave labor, and the fish is stinky nasty sitting on boats for days before processed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2maFXJGiHpE
Private Equity has destroyed the entire world enslaved everyone and Squid Games is real and happening IRL except even worse because it's less drama and more trauma

>>81658923

The point of me bringing up that you can replace the ceo with someone morally good is to show how little power any individual has over issues (competing interests, capitalism, human greed) that have gotten out of hand. So when anon says there are a group of individuals who decide how bad the world is because they are evil. They is a misnomer. It's not that 1% of the population is evil that the world is in a bad place, it's that 98% of the world is. I don't see then why you'd point out that 1% of the world is evil to defend anon's worldview that they do as much damage as the 98%. ? It seems like shoehorning in wanting to talk about archetypes which is fine. We are in MBTI afterall. But it doesn't help us.

>>81659127
it's not because*

I'm going to crash out typing on phone. Alright fuckit.

>>81659127
It's simple. That 1% is even more evil; they build themselves mindsets, environments, collectives, practices, co-blackmail systems to keep overlapping themselves with evil like how Zen monks try to maintain their pre-lingua state.

>>81659162

They do more damage to others than the average individual isfp yes, though that's not how I measure evil. A mother for example will go on to have who knows how many kids in the future, causally she does a lot of damage. But I'm not antinatlist because mothers cause pain I'm antinatlist because mothers are hypocritical. That is what all evil is, a contradiction between two principles. Ceos on average are more amoral than the average isfp who basically goes around judging everything as good or bad regardless of contradictions.

>>81659068

No im saying "just move on" doesn't actually address whether or not antinatlism is moral. People who owned slaves wanted those who were more progressive to "just move on" and accept that slavery is good. I'm comparing your behavior to them to show what you're saying can easily be used to justify immoral behavior and bias. So unless you are actually willing to engage with my argument it's a waste of time to call eachother biased or wrong. You arent proving anything by being snarky.

Tldr Nobody cares.

>>81659336
why is a contradiction between two principles more evil than actually doing damage? that doesn't make any sense at all

>>81659336
>A mother for example will go on to have who knows how many kids in the future, causally she does a lot of damage.
Yeah. If there was a way to have kids without it leading to predictable damage - that's malicious negligence. This wouldn't be an anti-natalist position, and the realistic responsibility distribution is seen. The legalislation systems have the technical details covered well enough.
>That is what all evil is, a contradiction between two principles.
I can't agree, as one can be openly evil without contradicting any camouflage. Being covert is just typically more efficient.

>>81659500

Good question, to maximize good within any given system of values. Because anyone can consider anything damage, or 'bad', yet we want to maintain the idea that of two seemingly contradicting opinions on what constitutes bad, only one is correct, the only way to decide that is to add other values until we figure out how many values are satisfied.

So for example if I think it's good to eat pb and j sandwhiches and I'm allergic to peanuts. And I think it'd be good to live. Well we have a contradiction. So I must add qualifiers aka more values to keep those two principles from contradicting. Pb and j sandwhich are good to eat for most people but not me. Now we have a functional moral statement.

>>81659522

This is is just significantly less functional than my system I don't know what to tell you. See above. It's the reason why the world is fucked, we keep trying to lord eachother's idea of good and bad over eachother to respect values for reasons other than to avoid contradictions. If we stop doing that right and wrong become very clear since no one stated off evil by your definition of evil yet everyone was wronged.

started off*

wronged in this case meaning their principles were contradicted.

>>81659756
Right, I kept using the term as if I had established it.
Evil is the succumbing to the anti-cooperative lizard brain power thrill.

I disagree. There's all sorts of good things that come from the instinct to dominate. As problematic a reward pathway of our brain is that's very not functional as a definition of evil lol, inside and outside the convo. Anon would disagree with you and I do but at least it's clarified.

I mean I assume you wouldn't consider a toddler evil just misguided. Such a definition doesn't account for everyone's needs. Then we are surprised when those people turn into criminals and whatever as if it is a magical process. If it is it's because society makes it so by expecting contradicting principles to come together for the goal of a society. That is magical thinking if I ever heard it. In reality even that child as soon as they are able to identify right and wrong for themselves should have their values respected, not always followed just respected. If it is not possible you advocate for something definitionally not functional.

Good for you though being on the winning side of life since nobody cares about the true extent of how much they inconvenience themselves or others.

why is patchy like this

>>81659956
You're not disagreeing with my definition, because my definition has a "succumbing to" part absent from the definition you're interpreting.
There's also the accountability part. A toddler could possibly do evil, but it's pointless to hold him accountable to it.
I had already thought it all over before posting.

>>81659658
>Pb and j sandwhich are good to eat for most people but not me
but the amoral pbj sandwich company CEO, that judges whether pbj sandwiches are good or not based on how much profit they bring to their company, will not care about individual complains such as this
if they could wipe away all other foods from the market and only sell pbj sandwiches to maximize their profit they would do it, not thinking twice about people allergic to them
so your statement that "pbj sandwiches are good to eat for most people but not me" means absolutely nothing to them, it holds no value to them
so I don't really understand how you're maximizing good by judging things according to your example, if anything it gives more space for people to do whatever they want

>>81660022

That is fair and in fact you may have a very well thought out moral system to account for how people are likely to act and move most kndividuals towards what is the most likely to bring happiness and avoid pain, or avoid hell, or what have you. But if the method is not specifically to eliminate contradictions, if that is not how you define good and evil, it is less functional than mine. Do you agree or disagree?

To me anything else seems ridiculous as it should to everyone.

>>81659994
>why is patchy like this
Like what?

>>81660120
>But if the method is not specifically to eliminate contradictions, if that is not how you define good and evil, it is less functional than mine. Do you agree or disagree?
The methods aren't even contradictory.
Eliminating contradictions is done to streamline a system of thoughts/beliefs/operations/etc.
Seeing someone getting addicted to lizard brain responses is done to handle them as the lizardbrains they are.

You could do both or either. Only involving the latter directly deals with evil. Not involving the former while involving the latter can make you end up contributing to evil by accident. Just the former alone could be used by evil for the purposes of evil to streamline evil.
Different types of tools.

>>81660073

Actions and principles are not the same. The principle is mental. If the ceo has no principle he is amoral not immoral. You, the person who buys a pb and j for 50 dollars, have two contradicting principles. It's good to eat the pb and j. I shouldn't have to pay for the price of it.

That is where many an isfp fail, their basic reasoning skills cause them to create their own issues because they feel their enviornment out with fi, intuition and trial and error. That's why they're more evil.

Remember no matter how extreme you think the example is (and btw these are principles I picked up studying enlightenment and classical philosophy not just internet debate bullshit) expectations are the root of all evil ultimately.

When a reggie has a meltie we should help the reggie not hurt the reggie

>>81659444
>People who owned slaves wanted those who were more progressive to "just move on"
Surely you must be aware of the fact that this is completely unrelated.
This is like saying "we'll Hitler thought he was doing the right thing. So you're basically Hitler"
But again, it's completely unrelated and doesn't even address the core of what I'm saying.

Antinatalism is immoral, unless you think humanity itself is immoral. The ONLY reason to think antinatalism is moral is if you think humans are a parasite. Which again, just goes back to the very first post I made on this subject about you projecting your own trauma.

>>81660348
>humans are a parasite. Which again, just goes back to the very first post I made on this subject about you projecting your own trauma.
Euhhm just because it could be/is a projection doesn't make the stance wrong tho.

>>81660223
so the pbj sandwich is overpriced? how is it evil to acknowledge this and not want to pay for something that is overpriced? if you're saying that the evil part is the action of buying the sandwich despite knowing it's overpriced then I kind of agree
but even then, there's another principle in play here
>if I don't buy a sandwich to eat I will eventually die of hunger
what are you supposed to do in this situation to not be deemed evil?

>>81660422
are you actually cute or just a larper

>>81660207

What is most likely to maximize happiness for individuals can be different from a group so I can only imagine you disagreeing with me through your use of a political philosophy that inappropriately generalizes human nature as a whole. In other words I know happiness and principles are not mutually exclusive yet you aren't just agreeing with me so I assume you aren't working from the angle of solving contradictions on a case by case basis and have something other than just maximizing happiness in mind when you say we ought to do good.

I feel like I've seen you appreciate history and human struggle significantly more than I do. Yet if I had it my way we would be brains and mouths connected to food and an endless upply of dopamine for an eternity, if we had to exist. And I don't *think* you want that.

>>81660348

It's related you don't bring up evidence you just personally attack me, so your argument is just as bad. And I didn't say you were a slave owner, you just have the same argumentation style.

>the core of what I'm saying

XD. Again all you did up until this point was say I'm projecting and immature, or that antinatlism = immature. I don't care about the core of that "argument" I care about evidence and strict apriori reasoning based on evidence. Not personal ancedotes or whatever.

I'm not antinatlist because I think humans are parasites. Who said that? Not me.

>>81660466

>what are you supposed to do to avoid evil

Good question. Die, or change your veiw of the sandwhich/price if the only thing to eat is the sandwhich.

Overpriced is mental, it's a principle you create; you can either drop it or keep it. Though not really since I don't believe in free will but that is a different talk. You are creating the perameters for evil by deciding the price is bad. Even if you cannot pay for it, that doesn't mean overpriced is bad. That is up to you.

You don't have schizophrenic episodes, you either have it or you don't. Honestly every moron edge lord things they're schizophrenic. You aren't you have a chemical inbalance and are insufferable. For bonus points you little edgelord you either see things or hear things never both at the same time it's different parts of the brain and different conditions that's why it's always so funny when dipshits like you get caught after hurting someone and pretend to be, anyone that knows anything knows the second you say I see and hear things your full of shit bok bok

>>81660585
u sound mad sir

>>81660585

Uh are you talking to me? Doesn't everyone have a chemical imbalance? I'm not a moron or edgy, I think being edgy requires you to try to be cool to others. Edgelord is synonymous with poser, I think. Definitely not schizo. Weird writeup.

>>81660508
>I can only imagine you disagreeing with me through your use of a political philosophy that inappropriately generalizes human nature as a whole.
Not so sure that's what my next line is.
>What is most likely to maximize happiness for individuals can be different from a group
If they're not both happy, you can safely assume either evil or inefficiency had happened.
>so I assume you aren't working from the angle of solving contradictions on a case by case basis and have something other than just maximizing happiness in mind when you say we ought to do good.
>I feel like I've seen you appreciate history and human struggle significantly more than I do. Yet if I had it my way we would be brains and mouths connected to food and an endless upply of dopamine for an eternity, if we had to exist. And I don't *think* you want that.
"People chase neurotransmitters" would exactly be a generalization of human nature.
What people really chase are states of experiencing. It's why druggies try out different subtypes of stimulants despite some giving more reinforcing "rewards", or why an addict turns on metacognition and drops his brain juice cope source out of disgust, or why countless spiritual practices each have different meditation practices getting you exactly different experiences, or why artists and directors try to differentiate and extract very specific microtypes of feeling for the viewers to integrate, and so on.
Basically, neurochemistry as people's scientific cores is so 19th century, it's all now quantum duality and qualia - millennia after introspective people had come to technically the same conclusions.

>>81660585
Take your meds, schizo.

tfw drenched in sweat because mowing all four sides of the yard around my house. I hope July is less rainy. The grass shouldn't be this high when I only mowed 12 days ago.

>>81658923
I'm tired of these threads with all of the low iq pseudos. Every person with no will power, capability, and ambition keeps spouting about money makes people bad

>>81660741
My inner INFJ-A would have a field day with you. Not today, not today.

The more developed Fe, the bigger the titties. Does not matter if you are man or woman.

>>81660796
If INFJ-A is inside of then you're gay.

>>81660822
so enfj-senpai is the biggest reggie

>>81660843
I don't quite understand... I'm speaking of a 16p type. What are you projecting?

>your type
>do you think people are mostly good in the world or mostly out to hurt you

How long will it take Kris to switch from diverting ego hits by association by being a fake simp for current most popular reggy, to devalue and discard?
Will he ever try to be someone's favorite reggy in earnest instead of settling for disingenuously and territorially latching on to the coattails of the big poppas?

idk but I hope that he doesn't be mean to turbie

>>81660720
I hate mowing. Good luck lol.

>>81660701

>now quantum duality and qualia

What people chase is subjective/pointless to argue because a human cannot be fully aware of all it's parts, and there are many takes on what seperates conscious/unconscious/intentional/unintentional. Just invoking personhood is a generalization. The conversation then is about what is the most functional generalization/neurological model. So what, you're assigning intentionality to quantum phenomenon in the brain? That doesn't contradict the idea that, whatever contradictions are the result of a more nuanced understanding a human, are not functional. You don't disagree with me, that any moral system that doesn't sort out those contradictions, is not functional. Do you have a model that legitimately excuses contradictive behavior as good or not.

Your examples only seem like confirmation to me.

>>81660918
>understanding of a human*
That's it I'm crashing out in three two one

>>81660575
>change your view of the sandwhich/price if the only thing to eat is the sandwhich
okay so I change the view on the price of the sandwich and now my new principle is that I should pay the price for it
however I don't have money to pay for it and I don't think that's a mental principle you create, it's an objective fact, you either have money to pay for it or you don't
my other principle is
>it's good to live
but I will soon die of hunger
I still don't see how good is maximized in that system

By the way. Speaking of "Rxy". The xNTJ persona was a "legit" persona inasmuch that it was a power fantasy persona born out of the notably subtly demonstrated fear out of lack of deterministic control over others.

>>81660918
>What people chase is subjective/pointless to argue because a human cannot be fully aware of all it's parts
Awareness doesn't matter since they're always dealing with the very experiencing in the very first place anyway.

>You don't disagree with me, that any moral system that doesn't sort out those contradictions, is not functional. Do you have a model that legitimately excuses contradictive behavior as good or not.
I already outlined that your model would be half of a model dealing with the matter as a whole >>81660207
i.e. two axes of "intention" and "consistency"
:::::::::::::::::::: consistent
anti-cooperative + cooperative
:::::::::::::::::::: inconsistent

Now we have the model, yes.

>>81660867
INTJ
Personally I feel that the spirit of mankind is no longer present, therefore mostly in opposition.

>>81660741
>I'm tired of these threads with all of the low iq pseudos. Every person with no will power, capability, and ambition keeps spouting about money makes people bad
It never ceases to amaze me. It fascinates me because I've never seen people be intelligent and yet be so fucking stupid despite it. There has to be a name for this. People with measurably high iqs but yet obvious retards who can't think critically.

I'm a Schrodinger's retard... Hello SH my old friend...

>>81661014
>By the way. Speaking of "Rxy". The xNTJ persona was a "legit" persona inasmuch that it was a power fantasy persona born out of the notably subtly demonstrated fear out of lack of deterministic control over others.
You don't get to speak about her.

Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy Rxy (featuring Prince from INFP May Cry!)

>>81660995
Overpriced isn't objective, math isn't objective either but I don't even have to argue that I just wanted to mention that.

We aren't arguing over what constitutes overpriced to begin with it's over what constitutes bad. Bad is a choice.

>I still don't see how good is maximized in that system

Yeah because you chose contradicting principles again lol. I don't mean to laugh like being mean or anything but that cracked me up ngl. Well in your example you'd be contradicting yourself and therefore evil. It's not enough to simply change your principles, like I said we are aiming to make them not contradict. I will also say out of all these conversations I find this one the most fun, because it is genuinely interesting watching your brain try to use intersubjective consistency (Ti).

And as you are probably starting to realize you cannot get what you want because of worldly limitations and then you will feel the need to moralize the fact that you are limited, or even, about to be destroyed. This is a very human sentiment. It is Fi in action and contrary to how I usually portray it, quite an innocent reaction. That is also why enlightenment or the absence of expectations is so hard to achieve. Changing your principles to keep yourself from moralizing and thus creating evil, regardless of how fair the world is to you, is the most mature thing one can do.

What the logic looks like when applied:

https://youtu.be/H0lLxZMK-E8?si=YeExnwIcO1-P4fWR

>>81661014
What is that last paragraph attempting to say lol. I'm not even going to try to decipher that.

>>81660867
INFJ-T

My views on human nature are a mixture of good and bad because the obvious truth is that they're a mixture of good and bad (though the bad is prominent enough to have made me more misanthropic over the years). Anyone who says that humanity is nothing but bad are probably blinded by their pain, because the fact that there's many good people out there is something that's very visible and easily observable. There's certainly a great deal of bad, though - misanthropes have a lot to back up their feelings and anyone who slaps them on the wrist and calls them a bitter loser is unfairly invalidating a valid perspective.

So with all that said, no, saying that people are 'all out to hurt you' is too paranoid schizophrenic even for me, and I'm more paranoid than the average person. People have a low tolerance for those who exhibit traits they dislike (however benign or trivial) and will often be unfairly bloodthirsty towards anyone who triggers them for whatever reason, but that's not the same thing as 'always being out to hurt you.' People often want to hurt others who don't deserve it, but they don't want to hurt all people at all times.

An aside, people are somewhat impressionistic and, in some cases, want to follow the tribe when they're doing both good and bad. The latter is obvious enough, bullying and the like, but sometimes people join in when the tribe is doing good - like the story of a high school kid bringing his mom to the high school prom because she missed out on hers years before. He was given widespread support from his classmates (probably a popular kid, but still). Some of the students would have offered their support no matter what the general consensus was; others had modifiable opinions. If the boy had been bullied, they would have bullied him as well because he was deemed to deserve it. Since the group response was pro-social, they joined in with that. They just want to be a part of the group's energy, whether destructive or not.

>>81661188
>What is that last paragraph attempting to say lol. I'm not even going to try to decipher that.
Dude had his heart broken by someone and you can tell

>>81660867
INTJ
I need to research humans more to be sure. Turbie Enjoyer, get onto the surgery table. Turbie is gonna L-O-V-E your autopsy video!

>>81660867
What is good?

>>81661189
>there's many good people out there is something that's very visible and easily observable.
It doesn't mean that consistent meaningful contact with such people is always possible, if ever, for any person. It's how very prolonged dehydration makes you doubt if you'd ever drunk water in your life.

>Some of the students would have offered their support no matter what the general consensus was; others had modifiable opinions. If the boy had been bullied, they would have bullied him as well because he was deemed to deserve it. Since the group response was pro-social, they joined in with that. They just want to be a part of the group's energy, whether destructive or not.
Wouldn't this be that most people are usually too lacking in self-agency and too inhumane to be held to humane standards of good/evil in the first place?

>>81661188
>Overpriced isn't objective
I am not saying overpriced is objective, I said the fact I don't have enough money to pay for it is objective
I don't think it costing 50 or 60 or 1 or whatever amount of dollars is good or bad, I am not judging the price
however when I go to pay for it and the cashier asks for a 50 dollar bill and I don't have one to give to the cashier, then that's an objective fact, I am not judging this as good or bad either, I just don't have what the cashier is asking for and thus I will not get the sandwich and die
>Yeah because you chose contradicting principles again
why are my own principles contradicting? my principles now are
>it's good to eat the pbj sandwich
>I should pay for it
>it's good to live
what's the contradiction in my own mental principles here? the "contradiction" comes from an external factor
whether I will let this bother me or not is a different matter

>>81661189
>misanthropes have a lot to back up their feelings and anyone who slaps them on the wrist and calls them a bitter loser is unfairly invalidating a valid perspective.
What makes it valid?

>>81660422
I didn't say it's wrong BECAUSE it's a projection.
I said it's wrong, and it's a projection.
It's wrong because it's anti-human.
And anti-human is a classic hallmark of shadow projection.
>>81660508
I didn't attack you, I said it's an immature stance. Just because you take offense to it since you identify with the idea as a part of ego, and felt attacked, doesn't mean I attacked you. Big difference.
Take note of what I said "anti-natalism is peak immaturity". You are not anti-natalism. Nor is it even your idea. It is merely something you identify with.
>strict apriori reasoning based on evidence.
Lol apriori reasoning, by its very definition, doesn't come from evidence. It literally means "pre-evidence" or "pre-experience".
Intuition can be an example of a priori knowledge. It's a way of knowing that arises without reliance on direct sensory experience or logical deduction. For example, sensing that it will rain without seeing clouds or checking the weather, no external evidence, suggests a kind of knowing prior to experience.
>I care about evidence
How very extroverted sensoid of you.
>I'm not antinatlist because I think humans are parasites.
I'll take the bait. Why are you anti natalist?
Inb4 you say humans are parasites in different words and then I quote this spoiler in a reply to (you).

>>81661506

By paying I thought you meant paying 50 dollars for it still. There's no contradiction there.

>>81661543
Many things, but /mbti/ is not the place to post anything vulnerable or sincere.

>>81661479
>It doesn't mean that consistent meaningful contact with such people is always possible, if ever, for any person. It's how very prolonged dehydration makes you doubt if you'd ever drunk water in your life.
Indeed, which is part of why people shouldn't engage in toxic normalfaggotry and moralize at anyone with misanthropic viewpoints, donning their pom poms and cheerlead for humanity, talking about how much they wuv the human race like it's a cartoon for four year olds. Shaming people for feelings which the world spent years or decades hammering into them isn't the right way to go about it.
>Wouldn't this be that most people are usually too lacking in self-agency and too inhumane to be held to humane standards of good/evil in the first place?
That's an interesting take. I wouldn't go that far (there's enough decent and intelligent people that I try not to get too deep into bitterness because that can cause collateral damage and color your feelings towards those who don't deserve it), but would be interesting to read opinions from people who do have that take.

>>81660867
>>your type
ESFP-T
>>do you think people are mostly good in the world or mostly out to hurt you
Most people whom I've interacted with have seemed like decent folk. I'm not self-centered enough to think that anyone is out to hurt me personally.

>>81660867
>your type
INFJ-A
>do you think people are mostly good in the world or mostly out to hurt you
Mostly good, for the most part.

>>81661650
>Many things, but /mbti/ is not the place to post anything vulnerable or sincere.
Why not?

>>81661729
Because people hold onto things you say and use it against you months or years into the future. See people digging up things that Lilac and Prince said during their late 2023/early 2024 fights as recently as a week ago.

Found a picture of Turbie Enjoyer and Turbie.

>>81661479
>Wouldn't this be that most people are usually too lacking in self-agency and too inhumane to be held to humane standards of good/evil in the first place?
Common Patch W take

>>81661729
OH MY JUNG! DID SOMEONE JUST THINK OF REGGY SEX RIGHT NOW? R E G G Y _ S E X !!!??? T-REX SEGGS? REGGY!?

>>81661774
>Because people hold onto things you say and use it against you months or years into the future.
And? So what?

>>81661777
Trips don't lie

REGGGY SEXXX LMAOOO XDDD

>>81661795
>And? So what?
Are you someone I know or just a random anon? If the former I can answer in private sometime.

>>81661774
To be fair, Lilac is a deranged freak, so any shit she spams stands out.

>>81661789
Stop seductressing me lol

Me on the left centard on the right

That's far too buff to be sintar

>>81661821
I'm someone you thought you knew, but we'll not be speaking in private. I was merely curious. Thanks for answering and have a good day

>>81661836
MBTIcraft in one pic
Good job sir

>>81661607

It doesn't make a difference whether you call me or my position immature neither of those are real arguments. You might as well have no typed that up, nobody with any presence of mind and intelligence takes that distinction seriously.

Apriori reasoning is always based on evidence so it isn't meant to be taken literally. In a discussion about what constitues evil it means reasoning concerning our ability to moralize, based on what we experience instead of what we believe others are experiencing. I would accept you telling me you can see or hear evil. I won't accept you telling me what's in my head. Which you seem to love doing. Then my job is to question the consistency of your limits. To find out what contradicts/is immoral.

Really there's no one word position to explain this stance, so I just use antinatlism as an umbrella term. In the case of anyone who does not want to risk their kid undergoing the worst the world can throw at the child. Including neurodegenerative diseases, slavery, depression, rape, suicide, prison time etc. Or the fallout that could effect the parent, having a kid is immoral.

Any time someone complains about a problem concerning their child, they're hypocritical and therefore immoral.

Any time someone wants to continue society through procreation yet complains about society, having children is immoral.

These are just extremely common forms of hypocrisy and therefore immorality that make me against having children 99% of the time. In the case of a psychopath who doesn't mind their kid being destroyed, tortured trafficked or whatever that is either amoral, or if they care about the kid but don't mind such risks that's moral.

Oh and obviously when I say your child I mean a child you actually decided to have but these posts get too long.

>tfw no work until a few days into August (Probably.) \(^o^)/


>>81623129 (OP)
INFJ-T!!! ^_^' Yes! It was confirmed again recently! ^_^7
I don't know! But I'm not diagnosed (including self-diagnosis)! :O
N-no... ^.^;;;
It's a secret! ^_~
Best: ENFJ-T (Chads and Stacies or at least close but not overly dominant and are sensitive and strive for harmony instead)! Worst: non-stereotypical INFJ-T (one that can't read people or social situations that well)! ~_^

>>81639875
<3 (>^_^)><(^_^<) <3

>>81649505
This seems to be the case! :Oc

>>81658303
Awwwww, thank you~! <3
You're one of my favorites as well! (>^_^)><(^_^<)

>>81660867
INFJ-T!!! '^_^
They're a mix of both! I like to think mostly good~! :3c But life has taught me to be wary of people, so I don't readily let them get too close to me! <(;w;)> Then again, I sometimes hate myself so much that I think "being good" and "being mostly out to hurt me" aren't necessarily mutually exclusive... :(


Goodnight, /mbti/! I still love you and was going to hug you, but the spam filter didn't let me! I hope this goes through: (>^_^)><(^_^<) !


I'm calling your name. I'm calling you.
Take me away! Take me far-out-away~! ;w;
Between two flyers without a clue.
Take me away! Take me far-out-away~! *o*

>>81661968
>Apriori reasoning is always based on evidence
No, it is not. You need to look up the word. You're thinking of postpriori. Apriori is before experience, observation or any sort of proof.

Apriori is saying "there is a banana on the banana tree" without looking at the banana tree.
Postpriori is saying "there is a banana on the banana tree" after you go outside and look at the banana tree.

>Or the fallout that could effect the parent, having a kid is immoral.
This is a strictly one sided perspective, that neglects all of the possible good things that could happen. And it reinforces the belief I have that you believe that humanity is a parasite and/or evil and that the world has nothing good to it. Not only that, you believe that there is no value in suffering or pain, and that it's a strictly moral evil which has no potential upsides or benefits. Which is EXACTLY what I said, just in far fewer words, when I said you were immature.
It's an extremely immature, one sided perspective.
I could literally spend thousands of hours on this very topic with you pointing to how all of this, this entire perspective is just a reflection of your psyche. It's just your own shadow you've confused with the devil. But sadly, this character limit severely hinders that.

It's also very easy to tell what's inside of people's heads. They will literally tell you it without even realizing they're doing it. Just as you have done.

I don't think you're a bad person, I don't think you're evil, either. I think you're deeply confused, and deeply, deeply wounded. And the perspective you're taking is based on those wounds. And you keep pointing to humanity, humans, or society as the root cause of these wounds and the source of all evil.

At the end of the day, life is full of risks. But risk aversion to an extreme doesn't solve that.

Oh yeah, and:
>>81661607
>Inb4 you say humans are parasites in different words and then I quote this spoiler in a reply to (you).

>>81662176
space jam slam dunk post

>>81662051
Good night sweet turbie ^_^
I hope I'll see you again~
Dream so well cutie

>>81661621
I think pbj sandwiches should only cost 5 dollars
I will go make my own pbj sandwich farm and sell them for 5 dollars instead of 50
people will buy more from me because who the hell wants to pay 50 dollars for something they can get for 5
that's much better than changing my principles to not be contradicting in a society where pbj sandwiches cost 50 dollars which will simply cause me to die of hunger
there're also a few other stuff I could do to change the price of the pbj sandwich or have more affordable options so why should I change my principles instead (and die)
sounds silly

>>81662227
Shaquille O'Neal from the free throw line post

>>81662051
Why are you off work until August?

>tfw the spam filter doesn't ship Turbie x /mbti/

>>81662176

Apriori reasoning doesn't exist the same way the word abstract in the dictionary is a contradiction yet we use it all the time to convey ideas accurately. I explained what I mean I don't need to look up anything, you just need to read what I explained if you are more concerned with whose ideas are correct than 'winning' an internet argument which I have my doubts.

>This is a strictly one sided perspective, that neglects all of the possible good things that could happen

That's untrue since a contradiction can't exist without good in the first place. You can't be hypocritical if you only seek something you think is bad and not good. How many times did I say the word hypocritical.

>no value in suffering or pain

Pain is not why I'm antinatlist, a contradiction in people principles concerning the value of good and bad are why. You don't have to experience any pain or happiness to be principly against or for having kids. I don't care if someone who has kids is happy or upset when they contradict themselves.

The rest, the psychoanalysis shit. I didn't finish reading. Lets get you through the basics first.

>>81662285
random spectator from the crowd halftime half-court shot for a million dollars failure on the jumbotron post

>using the whetstone? I'll just bash the tree with the axe's handle instead
Le human nature...

>>81662240

Between you and me I feel it's bullshit that i should have to change my principles too to accommodate the world. I feel I'd rather kill people I don't like, like a god. Unfortunately everyone feels that way, and the only consistent factor is us. So ultimately it always an option to address our principles as individuals, not an option to address the world. And that makes it much more consistent than changing the world for addressing evil and promoting good. There are many things you don't even realize you have the power not to veiw as evil probably that you let sow discord in your life. Like someone blatantly being a cunt to you lol.

Why is Patchy deleting his posts?

>>81662407
>Why is Patchy deleting his posts?
He's not deleting. He's been bad

He's being sent to the reluctant foot tease rehabilitation center

>>81662350
just change your principles to make killing other people good bro

https://files.catbox.moe/nx98ts.jpg
>>81662407
I had realized I'm gravely offending the regs and jannies by not posting transfolx negro kekoldry israel propaganda content... Isn't that right, darling...?

on a scale of 1-10, grade patch post-heartbreak melty

>>81662498

Thanks but I'll get over it. Eventually.

>>81662285
You may as well say it's potato reasoning, Sun Goddess reasoning, or pineapple upside down cake reasoning, because those are all equally as meaningless as calling it apriori reasoning. You know, due to the fact that you've completely thrown out the definition of apriori.
You could replace apriori with any other word and it would have the same meaning. It's lettuce reasoning, or silly sand reasoning, or maybe it's cupcake sunday reasoning.
Words do matter. Especially if you're claiming to value precision or intellectual honesty. Redefining apriori to mean whatever suits your argument doesn't clarify anything, it just muddies the waters and makes your point incoherent.
Apriori means before experience or evidence. Which was the point of the banana tree example. Apriori knowledge can come from from theory, but theories are not evidence nor are they experience. Just like you can theoretically add 2 + 2 and get 4 without having to get two objects and two other objects and count them.
This is the chain:
Apriori -> Experience/proof/evidence -> Postpriori
>How many times did I say the word hypocritical.
A bunch of times, but ultimately it doesn't matter. Because it's not hypocritical. If you have a kid, and something bad happens, it's not hypocritical if you complain about it. That's just a fucking stupid take.

Now we go deeper into your backwards ass definitions in order for you to expose yourself more, so that you can prove my point in your own words.

Why is is immoral to have kids?
Caveat, you can't say "because it's hypocritical", since that would be a circular definition by the way you've defined things.

B plus'ing right now

>>81662549

I dont have the patience for you pretending I didnt clarify what apriori means. Are unicorns abstract yes or no. Simple question. Answer it honestly and I'll give your answer the same consideration you gave my explanation.

>That's just a fucking stupid take

Epic.

>Caveat, you can't say "because it's hypocritical", that would be circular

But I literally gave you examples to dispute. Killing is only conditionally wrong. Having children is conditionally wrong. Address the conditions I gave. That's the opposite of circular because the means to dispute me are right there you just don't want to engage with them. It's not like they're esoteric examples either they're 99% of what parents do. The exceptions I also outlined. It's not like you can find a single example of evil that is not hypocritical either.

enfj-senpai x kris

Kris x garbage compactor

>>81662549
>>81662623
100 games too many of skee ball at Chuck E Cheese to earn tickets for the GI Joe Cobra Hiss Tank construction set your parents could have bought online for a fraction of the cost tier posts

The resident stalker is jealous of someone else getting more attention again. Many such cases.

>>81662746
>The resident stalker is jealous of someone else getting more attention again. Many such cases.
Why does your mind go immediately to attention? Such is your currency, isn't it?

>>81662623
>pretending I didnt clarify what apriori means.
The clarification you offered was the definition of an entirely different word. You may as well have said something like "Oh, yeah, by apple, I really mean sand castle on the side of the beach about to be hit by a cascading wave."
Which is hardly a clarification. What you've done is redefine apriori to mean what you want it to mean.
>Are unicorns abstract yes or no.
Yes. Unicorns are not objects. And to further my point, and reply to a point which I thought was completely worthless to reply to, the definition of abstract is not a contradiction in any way shape or form.
It has multiple different definitions which are context dependent. The one you're using refers specifically to lack of physical form, AKA unicorns as abstract entities, not concrete objects. It's pretty straightforward.
>Killing is only conditionally wrong.
We have a phrase for that already. It's called murder. This logic does not apply to child birth.
>Address the conditions I gave.
There's literally nothing to address.
You said, in short "If you don't want bad things to happen to your kid, but then you have a kid, you're a hypocrite which makes you immoral."
Like, what am I supposed to say to that? There's nothing to say, beyond the fact that it's a stupid point, which is just a blunt way of saying "No, you're wrong."
The best, and really only thing I can do is ask WHY it is that this is immoral?

If you have a kid and bad things happen to that kid, you're not immoral. Unless, of course, you're the one who directly did those things. Like if you rape your own kid, as an example. Obviously, that's immoral.
But, OBVIOUSLY, you blame your parents for the bad things that have happened to you, because they brought you into the world. And YOU don't want to be responsible, through your own warped lens, of what happens to your own kids.

>>81662784
https://youtube.com/shorts/tG4wmN0oLmU?si=s3G3QOWy0bN9ls74

>>81662784

>Which is hardly a clarification. What you've done is redefine apriori to mean what you want it to mean

That's what a clarification is because all words have multiple meanings, which you already understand. And I know you understand that that's why I said you're pretending. But when it's convenient you will ignore that fact.

>refers specifically to lack of physical form, AKA unicorns as abstract entities, not concrete objects. It's pretty straightforward.

>existing in thought or as an idea but not having a physical or concrete existence.

Huh, that's uh... thats a little interesting because last time I checked thoughts were physical. Wonder how that works. Mind explaining? I mean what about a thought is non physical of course, anything else wouldn't be the dictionary definition. That'd just be you recontextualizing abatract to mean whatever you want it to mean when John Google himself anointed the word abstract. You'd never go against Jesus I mean the dictionary right anon?

This is so gay. I don't know how you can bring up good faith acting like that^

>The best, and really only thing I can do is ask WHY it is that this is immoral?

You're floundering and I already explained the same thing thrice. You can read as well. I'm going to go eat. Bye mbti. This won't be a regular occurrence or anything.

>>81662934
>Bye mbti. This won't be a regular occurrence or anything.
Such a shame

>>81662934
Yes, words have multiple meanings. But apriori means "before experience". And none of its other meanings mean anything other than that.
You said "I care about evidence and strict apriori reasoning based on evidence."
This is NOT apriori reasoning. Because it's based on evidence. This is POST priori.

>last time I checked thoughts were physical
What in the retardation did I just read? When was the last time you held a thought in your hands, smelled one with your nose, tasted one with your tongue? Thoughts are strictly NOT physical. Physical things are objects, thoughts are not objects. You cannot take a thought, put it into a clay mold, pour in molten metal and forge a solid thought. That's pure nonsense.
You clearly don't know what physical means, just like you don't know what apriori means.
>I mean what about a thought is non physical of course
They lack physical form. Physical things are made of matter. Thoughts are not made of matter. A tree is made of matter, your hand is made of matter, the drink in your cup is made of matter. These are physical objects.
>You're floundering
You're avoiding answering the question because you know full well it would show how much of a hypocrite you are.

https://files.catbox.moe/2yyzyw.jpg
>compass bad, i don't see the point
>infj-a anti-rhetoric good, i don't see the point
Yikes my gawd, do irregulars really...?

>whoever smelt it dealt it
irrefutable psychological smackdown

however, consider twin and i show up to your hovel with the front loading apparatus

https://files.catbox.moe/06jsha.jpg
>>81662407
Such timing tho! Such observance over old posts! Truly, the emporium of the perceptive, this place is...

holy kek I have like 3 different people on simultaneous meltdown mode right now

>>81663101
Your family must be extremely proud of you. Perhaps you can speak about this great accomplishment one day at a wedding or funeral.

>>81663119
>Your family must be extremely proud of you. Perhaps you can speak about this great accomplishment one day at a wedding or funeral.
Contemplate the seethe trigger

"Wolf!", he cried.

Wolf,
say you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrwT3bhRz8M

>>81663131
I'm none of the people you argued with. I think it's pretty retarded to feel accomplished or brag about something as ridiculous as that though. Perhaps you can buy a new car with all the seethe you just earned however.

>>81663148
>I'm none of the people you argued with.
I have not argued with anyone in this thread. "Your Meds, Schizo", mayhaps?

>I think it's pretty retarded to feel accomplished or brag about something as ridiculous as that though.
lol i'm not even trying

>Perhaps you can buy a new car with all the seethe you just earned however.
or I'll enjoy the moment and savor your self-assured ignorance

https://files.catbox.moe/pj4glf.jpg
Leaving too many patterns all over the place... Should call the jannies to clean it up for you...

https://files.catbox.moe/qvdsld.jpg
Ok, time to use my Umineko skills and sort everything out in a timeline...
...
...
...
...oh lol.

Piitter pattern the clock strikes Saturn
Kitter Cattern the dreams start shatterin'
A twist of the tongue and flip the sun
Nine lives dancing on the edge of one
You done shat ur pants
And it was caught at a glance

Whooops,
Better adjust your stance
Hide the shit in your britches
Pull a grin through the stitches
In your sides
So sharp
They divide the mind
Schizo~

Don't know where you're going
Blitzo

>Be a shame if all it took to expose your samefagging was a ban severe enough to get all recent posts made with your IP erased... Again. Better get busy and start self-deleting before things escalate.
And then the guilty conscience made the first move.

truly epic armchair analysis

Do you guys think Rxy will ever be back?

>*Analyzes your armchair*
>*strokes invisible beard*
>Mmhhh, yes, indubitably..
>cotton, silk, an unmistakable aura of cat and a tinge of daddy issues
>Truly a postmodern chair.

Rxy game to end of thread in the rxy didn't she? or was that a fake rxy? :o

>>81663408
rxy is infj-a

if rxy is an infj then i like her more implicitly

infj-a is rxy who is kris who is lilac who is centaur who is turbie

did centaur died? :c

>>81663481
yes, a few months ago

I know you did not just say I'm Turbie
You did NOT just do that

>>81663481
>did centaur died? :c
Thrilling knife sex to the edge taken a little too far

Actually? post archive if true

>>81663416
Not to be mean but he's not smart enough to pull her off

Rxy willfully obfuscating the definition of "persona" multiple times in a general heavily featuring Jungian psychoanalysis just because of being so defensive about getting accused of larping is... pretty ironic.

>>81663611
You guys really like to make things up huh

fuck off sophie

>>81662051
(You) (You) (You)
(You) (You) (You)
(You) (You) (You)
(>^_^)><(^_^<)
Mwah Mwah Mwah
(You) (You) (You)
I Love (You)
Yes I do! <3
(>^_^)><(^_^<)

>>81662051
>This seems to be the case! :Oc
I cannot believe it that INFJ-A would do such a thing ;-;
I think he doesn't actually hate you he is just a nihilist who doesn't know what it means to be Good ;-;
(>T_T)><(T_T<) Let us forgive him of his hate and just ignore such a malicious villain.

>>81662051
>You're one of my favorites as well! (>^_^)><(^_^<)
Am I your favorite??? ^_^'''
ok ok you don't have to say :3c

>>81662051
>Goodnight, /mbti/! I still love you and was going to hug you, but the spam filter didn't let me! I hope this goes through: (>^_^)><(^_^<) !
MMMMMM (>^_^)><(^_^<) Tight hugs
I hope you have a great starrt to your summer ^_^ and spend time with meeeee ^_^ ;3c

>>81662051
>N-no... ^.^;;;
>It's a secret! ^_~
*dream peaks* OwO

>>81663563
Operation Retrograde is indeed one of the projects in my jurisdiction. But it has nothing to do with INFJ-A's intelligence. Proper allocation of duties for proper application of skill.

>>81663989
that's cool but I don't really care

>>81664006
Yes, all your caring centers are still quite occupied by the loss you haven't consciously processed or integrated yet. No rush; we love you for your "Devil t-totally doesn't care or anything, baka!" remarks, too.

>>81664060
wow you're desperate

For a change, shall we make End of Thread.. Topical? Relevant, eerily? ..Seeing as lately you've been running amok post 499 and earlier regardless.

To comment on a person's intellect isn't inherently insulting. Only if you place such value on intellectualism that anything but is offensive to your tastes - placing value on "ism"s, yikes. If you put enough stock in the belief that to question someone's intellect could be insulting to them or could lower them in the eyes of another, it's probably disingenuous or at the least irrelevant to say *your* intent isn't to be hurtful. You know it could hurt them, or if not, tarnish their image.

wow they're really upset about that intelligence comment. deep insecurity

trolled
beyond
belief

Turbie Turbie Turbie
(You) (You) (You)
>>81662051
>I'm calling your name. I'm calling you.
owo
>Take me away! Take me far-out-away~! ;w;
*grasps hand tightly*
>Between two flyers without a clue.
*w* flying after you
>Take me away! Take me far-out-away~! *o*
come visit and enjoy your stay ;3c

"Turbie is fake" enjoyers in shambles when she writing beautiful cosmic wave shifting sing songs like this
"Turbie is real" enjoyers win again!! ^_^*

Wait someone has to make the new thread D: