>>2978815
you can see it with bad adetailer settings and messy artist mixes, you get a discolored box around the detected part, unless it does padding differently in adetailer (idk honestly), since those extra pixels dont get touched with normal inpainting

>>2978649
couple of nice results just setting them low, surprisingly strongly trained considering who they're mixed with and how much lower they are, not sure i like it as much though, at least as it is