Do tanks make more sense as a “bad guy” vehicle?
>Faceless, has no humanoid properties, dehumanizing similar to putting a face-concealing helmet on a soldier
>Requires multiple crew, taking away the heroism
>Heavy and clumsy, bowling over things in their way instead of gracefully moving around it
>Associated with militarism and authoritarianism
>Cheap and disposable compared to mechs
Whereas humanoid mechs are much more of a good guy vehicle.

Do tanks make more sense as a “bad guy” vehicle?
>Faceless, has no humanoid properties, dehumanizing similar to putting a face-concealing helmet
>Requires multiple crew, taking away the heroism
>Heavy and clumsy, bowling over things in their way instead of gracefully moving around it
>Associated with militarism and authoritarianism
>Cheap and disposable compared to mechs
Whereas humanoid mechs are much more of a good guy vehicle.

Do tanks make more sense as a “bad guy” vehicle?
>Faceless, has no humanoid properties, dehumanizing similar to putting a face-concealing helmet
>Requires multiple crew, taking away the heroism
>Heavy and clumsy, bowling over things in their way instead of gracefully moving around it
>Cheap and disposable compared
Whereas humanoid mechs are much more of a good guy vehicle.

How do we make take combat cool again?