Search Results
6/11/2025, 8:10:37 AM
Anyone else think the new force org chart is actually more restrictive than before despite what GW is claiming? It's not really freeform if you're forced to take a character every time you want something other than basic troops. By the looks of it every army is literally going to need at minimum like 4 characters now for a proper 3k list and you're really going to need to make tradeoffs in units due to how low the detachments are in slot count. Like if you want terminators, a dreadnought, tanks and a special weapons squad in your army you will literally need to take 4 motherfuckers in order to even build a fairly standard balanced army comp. I think 5 or more might even be needed in a lot of cases unless armies are significantly smaller in this edition compared to the last. I think they maybe are jacking off the idea of characters too much here, the expanded challenge rules make sense with how many characters are going to be in armies now.
Page 1