Search Results
7/6/2025, 7:32:30 PM
>>280304079
If anything I'd say MIA is the bell curve meme. You have the absolute normiest of normies who would watch it because it has Studio Ghibli staff or because something like Crunchyroll's Anime of the Year or Toonami shilled it or because Riko uoooohhh, right? And then you have fans who legit appreciate the amazing thing it really is as a work of art and a cultural phenomenon on a deeper level and who sperg out HARD over it.
>>280304548
>Doesn't mean it elevates the story simply because it's in line with the theme of child exploitation, and frankly, it isn't. It's like a movie about the horrors of war occasionally trying to make killing really, really cool. It fucks with the theme.
I'm not even going with the misplaced "the lolisho stuff fits with the themes of child exploitation" argument I see so often in defense of it. I don't think Tsucc flopped Riko's titty out for a single panel because pedoshit can somehow be thematically bound up with Bondrewd kidnapping orphans or Belchero not having OSHA compliance. I'm not that naive. The man is a lolicon, and certain scenes, particularly in the manga, probably are meant to be titillating.
I'm saying the libido is a good thing in and of itself. I think that drawing is probably a masturbatory/tactile process for him, that it's probably why he doesn't particularly like drawing old dudes, and that it translates to things like stone surfaces and tummies and tufts of fur or grass feeling touchable. Apart from the motivation factor of getting Tsucc out of bed, I don't think the art would be the same without his horny. I think the shape language of it is sublimated horny to a nonzero degree and that the absence of that would make every shot less expressive.
I also think that something can be weird and also serve storytelling purposes.
If anything I'd say MIA is the bell curve meme. You have the absolute normiest of normies who would watch it because it has Studio Ghibli staff or because something like Crunchyroll's Anime of the Year or Toonami shilled it or because Riko uoooohhh, right? And then you have fans who legit appreciate the amazing thing it really is as a work of art and a cultural phenomenon on a deeper level and who sperg out HARD over it.
>>280304548
>Doesn't mean it elevates the story simply because it's in line with the theme of child exploitation, and frankly, it isn't. It's like a movie about the horrors of war occasionally trying to make killing really, really cool. It fucks with the theme.
I'm not even going with the misplaced "the lolisho stuff fits with the themes of child exploitation" argument I see so often in defense of it. I don't think Tsucc flopped Riko's titty out for a single panel because pedoshit can somehow be thematically bound up with Bondrewd kidnapping orphans or Belchero not having OSHA compliance. I'm not that naive. The man is a lolicon, and certain scenes, particularly in the manga, probably are meant to be titillating.
I'm saying the libido is a good thing in and of itself. I think that drawing is probably a masturbatory/tactile process for him, that it's probably why he doesn't particularly like drawing old dudes, and that it translates to things like stone surfaces and tummies and tufts of fur or grass feeling touchable. Apart from the motivation factor of getting Tsucc out of bed, I don't think the art would be the same without his horny. I think the shape language of it is sublimated horny to a nonzero degree and that the absence of that would make every shot less expressive.
I also think that something can be weird and also serve storytelling purposes.
Page 1