Search Results
7/17/2025, 3:56:31 PM
>>510627355
>1550 is still a very bad look bro bro
>That means Europeans as a whole used Roman numerals for everything for 1550+ years.
that's assuming in my tiny collection i've got the very first euro coin ever using decimal numbers, not sure 'bout that bro.
Can you show me indian coins using decimal numbers? Because apparently your very first coin using them was in 1434 :
>1434 CE: An interesting aspect of the Eastern Ganga dynasty coin dates is that these coins may be the earliest Hindu coins using decimal numbers for dating. Earlier dated coins used the old Brahmi numbering system, which employed separate symbols to represent each of the single digits, as well as separate symbols for two-digit multiples of ten, such as 20, 30, 40, and so on (much like in many ancient civilisations).
>1550 is still a very bad look bro bro
>That means Europeans as a whole used Roman numerals for everything for 1550+ years.
that's assuming in my tiny collection i've got the very first euro coin ever using decimal numbers, not sure 'bout that bro.
Can you show me indian coins using decimal numbers? Because apparently your very first coin using them was in 1434 :
>1434 CE: An interesting aspect of the Eastern Ganga dynasty coin dates is that these coins may be the earliest Hindu coins using decimal numbers for dating. Earlier dated coins used the old Brahmi numbering system, which employed separate symbols to represent each of the single digits, as well as separate symbols for two-digit multiples of ten, such as 20, 30, 40, and so on (much like in many ancient civilisations).
Page 1