>>106104673
buy into the future and buy a 5090
the best investment you can make
well, eventually you will have to spend more to get more anyway
the brutal fact that a high end gpu will hold value and your displays/monitors value will tank insanely much in value needs not to be said

>>106104699
>is enough for 4k 144hz+, right?
if you replaced your question with 5090 the answer would still be no and you would still be cpu limited in some cases too

>>106104815
buying an inferior display because you cannot hit native res is a dead meme

>>106105016
no, every side will be disingenuous and try lure you to their team

>>106105219
>14600k
you already lost it