>>2927975
I specifically said:
>Must really suck to be a wrenchlet that can't handle maintaining small engines.

You replied with:
>Wow that’s really impressive and in ten years that will be as useful as mechanical typewriter repair.

Which implies that in 10 years being able to repair a small engine will be a thing of the past. We can derive one of these things from this retarded statement. Either:

A) There will be practically no more small engines to work on in 10 years.
B) All small engines will be maintenance free within 10 years.
C) There will be no people left in 10 years to use or work on small engines.

All of which are inherently false and retarded, with the most likely scenario of those three actually being option C.

>>2927975
>I was being a bit hyperbolic but yes, dipshit, in 10-15 years it will be extremely unusual to find gas engines on new lawn equipment. Commercial lawn equipment may be more like 20-25. I never said they wouldn’t exist. I never said anything about the engines themselves, my reading comprehension challenged friend. The average person will have no use for the knowledge to repair them, or someone who does.

Nice backpedal. The average person doesn't own any heavy equipment either, so therefore being a heavy equipment mechanic is no longer a viable living come 2035 as well right? You see how retarded that sounds? You are an imbecile.

>>2927975
>The internal combustion engine is going extinct for the general public. You can all cry about it as loud as you want but it’s going to happen anyway. Change is part of life so stop being a massive pussy about it.

Lol. Check out this cope. Internal combustion isn't going anywhere anytime soon son.