Search Results
6/30/2025, 11:23:01 AM
>>529370980
I get the same feeling. Online it's always just spamraam in either the F-16 or the F-18. There is also the group of people that don't want anything more modern than a radar screen in their jets so the glass cockpit of the 346 would make them puke.
Personally I still think it would be a nice module for basically almost everything al long as you're okay with it being transonic. It has the Marte antiship missile, MRAAMs so you can't just lob a bunch of AIM120s. Gunpod would be a downside tho.
Realistically 80% of the functions of the non FA version are useless in DCS. What is the point of simulating various AA/AG and other modes when you're already in a simulator?
The FA variant would be the way to go if they could implement some modern EW aspects in DCS.
Hell, I would even be okay with a Yak-130 even if it's ass to have to lose 2 hardpoints if you want to have flare/chaff. I seriously don't understand why they wouldn't go for an in-body approach like with every other fucking jet.
Regarding the poor performance of trainers in DCS I feel like it's also due to the maps. I don't know how to explain it but flying for a long while in MSFS in a slower trainer is no big deal, I'll even make fake bombing runs etc. While in DCS after unloading all rockets and bombs I get tired of just flying around.
I get the same feeling. Online it's always just spamraam in either the F-16 or the F-18. There is also the group of people that don't want anything more modern than a radar screen in their jets so the glass cockpit of the 346 would make them puke.
Personally I still think it would be a nice module for basically almost everything al long as you're okay with it being transonic. It has the Marte antiship missile, MRAAMs so you can't just lob a bunch of AIM120s. Gunpod would be a downside tho.
Realistically 80% of the functions of the non FA version are useless in DCS. What is the point of simulating various AA/AG and other modes when you're already in a simulator?
The FA variant would be the way to go if they could implement some modern EW aspects in DCS.
Hell, I would even be okay with a Yak-130 even if it's ass to have to lose 2 hardpoints if you want to have flare/chaff. I seriously don't understand why they wouldn't go for an in-body approach like with every other fucking jet.
Regarding the poor performance of trainers in DCS I feel like it's also due to the maps. I don't know how to explain it but flying for a long while in MSFS in a slower trainer is no big deal, I'll even make fake bombing runs etc. While in DCS after unloading all rockets and bombs I get tired of just flying around.
Page 1