>>16696572
>It's only going to get worse once the NASA cuts go through.
If you guys can distract them while they're not looking, I'll run in and change the
> -$X funding
to
> +$X funding
It's crazy and farfetched, I know
Could even consider it to be a moonshot
I wonder what would would happen if NASA restructured as an 5013c? Or keep NASA as is, and just contract everything out to a more favorable structure(if there even is a more preferable one)