>>712532629
It's perfectly reasonable to talk about Odyssey's accuracy as a sequel to a franchise that used to champion itself on the internal consistency of the historical past being the same as ours in every obvious public manner that'd be known by historians outside of Abstergo's pockets, where the more fantastical elements were kept outside the record and limited to specific small instances across history ala Al Mualim fight in Masyaf's "Paradise". Betraying that is betraying the core of the franchise, which is a perfectly fine matter to complain about alongside everything else.