Search Results
8/4/2025, 1:57:31 AM
8/3/2025, 12:25:41 PM
>>717162852
>>717162826
oh and btw, these really are just feminist theories put into place that already took hold in literature departments in the 90s. All this shit is available on Wikipedia, but if you suggest it's being put into place it's a conspiracy.
You can catch them in their own logic though by saying:
1. Are these in theory good ideas?
2. If they are, then it's the moral duty to impliment them right?
3. There are past clips saying the male gaze is a problem and should be eliminated. Are the right or wrong? Have their ideas been implimented yet?
They have to say eliminating the Male Gaze is a moral good, and that it SHOULD be implimented. Having them to defend that it also somehow hasn't been implimented yet, even though everyone in power seemingly agrees it should be, doesn't make any sense.
>>717162826
oh and btw, these really are just feminist theories put into place that already took hold in literature departments in the 90s. All this shit is available on Wikipedia, but if you suggest it's being put into place it's a conspiracy.
You can catch them in their own logic though by saying:
1. Are these in theory good ideas?
2. If they are, then it's the moral duty to impliment them right?
3. There are past clips saying the male gaze is a problem and should be eliminated. Are the right or wrong? Have their ideas been implimented yet?
They have to say eliminating the Male Gaze is a moral good, and that it SHOULD be implimented. Having them to defend that it also somehow hasn't been implimented yet, even though everyone in power seemingly agrees it should be, doesn't make any sense.
Page 1