>>714299305
I'd wager general malaise towards smartphones amongst the younger population, that combined with people beginning to realize that touchscreen games suck shit and physical buttons blow it out of the water

>>105646499
How are webp making your life truly inconvenient? The charger thing I get and obviously agree, but the other bit makes no sense. Personally I use jpg/png whenever needed, but don't strive away from webp or avif if it's unavoidable, worst case I'll just convert them as it's quick and low skill.
Can post webp no issue everywhere too, the only place causing trouble being 4chan which is a site problem as it's behind.
>>105646485
>the fault of 4chan for not implementing it
>your file system for not rendering it.
Bingo. 4chin supports webm, vp8 and 9, so why not webp, too? Hell, I managed to solve windows thumbnail issues for webm, webp or avif files, so anyone else should be able to.
>>105646504
Or in other words it's a user/uploader problem. The format gives people a choice, and if the user decides to make a dumb choice the codec is terrible? It's annoying for the end user, sure, but how much will that really become relevant?