Search Results
7/20/2025, 1:43:31 PM
7/16/2025, 10:36:53 AM
>>105923799
That's the modus operandi for whites.
Remeber the brothers grimm fairytale "Little snow white" from 1811? She was a 6 yr old girl in there, and the witch was her biological mother.
Whites got ahold of it, and now it's just "Snow White" in the 1920s, and she's 16, and the witch is a step mother.
In the original German the Prince fell in love with a cute little girl child.
Whites couldn't have that.
There's only one solution: and that is to do to them what they do to "mmaallles": and that is kill them.
Like these white christians in the comments on youtube and here are baying for Jeremy's blood.
YHWH's law of child girl brides for men will not come true without obeying his solution regarding those who deny his Law and say to follow another Power (ie the USGovt etc)
That's the modus operandi for whites.
Remeber the brothers grimm fairytale "Little snow white" from 1811? She was a 6 yr old girl in there, and the witch was her biological mother.
Whites got ahold of it, and now it's just "Snow White" in the 1920s, and she's 16, and the witch is a step mother.
In the original German the Prince fell in love with a cute little girl child.
Whites couldn't have that.
There's only one solution: and that is to do to them what they do to "mmaallles": and that is kill them.
Like these white christians in the comments on youtube and here are baying for Jeremy's blood.
YHWH's law of child girl brides for men will not come true without obeying his solution regarding those who deny his Law and say to follow another Power (ie the USGovt etc)
7/15/2025, 6:19:19 AM
>>105910944 >>>105910918 (You) >>>105910883 (You)
>shut up pedo, you'll end up getting caught sooner or later
Caught for what, woman?
Supporting YHWH's pro-child bride Law?
Opposing another Power: as YHWH commands?
YHWH explicitly allows child brides.
Jeremy Bicha is a heterosexual: and was since he was 11. This angers you because you are a New Testament Christian white woman. You reject YHWH and his World. You accept Jesus Christ because he claims an escape from YHWH's world. YHWH is the God of THIS world (Psalms). Which your Jesus Christ opposes as "the adversary" and "a liar and a murderer from the beginning".
I pray to YHWH that he gives Jeremy Bicha the strenght to carry on in his Loli loving ways: and that he takes little girls as brides.
I also pray that you: who have rejected YHWH's Law: are killed dead and gone: or that you come to accept YHWH's ways.
I pray for vengence against those who oppose men taking young virgin girls as their own: such as Brian Lunduke and other feminists and white people of the same type.
YHWH allows child brides.
Death To women's Rights.
>shut up pedo, you'll end up getting caught sooner or later
Caught for what, woman?
Supporting YHWH's pro-child bride Law?
Opposing another Power: as YHWH commands?
YHWH explicitly allows child brides.
Jeremy Bicha is a heterosexual: and was since he was 11. This angers you because you are a New Testament Christian white woman. You reject YHWH and his World. You accept Jesus Christ because he claims an escape from YHWH's world. YHWH is the God of THIS world (Psalms). Which your Jesus Christ opposes as "the adversary" and "a liar and a murderer from the beginning".
I pray to YHWH that he gives Jeremy Bicha the strenght to carry on in his Loli loving ways: and that he takes little girls as brides.
I also pray that you: who have rejected YHWH's Law: are killed dead and gone: or that you come to accept YHWH's ways.
I pray for vengence against those who oppose men taking young virgin girls as their own: such as Brian Lunduke and other feminists and white people of the same type.
YHWH allows child brides.
Death To women's Rights.
7/8/2025, 7:17:55 AM
>>105832239
I hope he contributes to Xlibre under the "anyone is welcome, furries or faries"
Richard Matthew Stallman likes cute young girls,
and YHWH explicitly allows child brides.
Bring him into the Xlibre Italy Fold.
>>105833891
YHWH allows child brides.
You have cow wives: fat as fuck and ruling over you.
Why do whites force this on everyone in the world?
I hope he contributes to Xlibre under the "anyone is welcome, furries or faries"
Richard Matthew Stallman likes cute young girls,
and YHWH explicitly allows child brides.
Bring him into the Xlibre Italy Fold.
>>105833891
YHWH allows child brides.
You have cow wives: fat as fuck and ruling over you.
Why do whites force this on everyone in the world?
7/7/2025, 3:16:45 PM
>>105826698
Under copyright law you are not allowed to stage a public performace against the copyright owners wishes.
Nor are you allowed to make an annotation without the copyright owners wishes.
The copyright owners did not desire a CoC to be added to corpus of their work.
Nor did the copyright owners desire for, using their work as a backdrop, speech of others to be judged and punished: using their Copyrighted work as a cudgel and a lure.
The copyright owners made this explicitly clear earlier in FreeSoftware/Opensource's reign both in written statements, recorded statements, and on video.
They said that anyone was welcome to contribute: they only cared about the quality of the code. This is evidence to their intentions.
They also wrote in their Copyright License that "additional restrictions" not envisioned within the 4 corners of their License: are barred.
The CoC's are a violation, in addition to the reasons previously stated:
1) Because they are a forbidden annotation to the Corpus of the Copyrighted work (additional restrictions are barred, explicitly. Codes of Conduct are indeed additional restrictions (speech restrictions against contributors and current other copyright holders))
2) Because they are a public performance not permitted by the Copyright holders. The act of bringing "racist fascists mysoginist white males" up on "Charges" with the Corpus of Copyrighted work as the backround: is such a public performace of the Work that is barred in explicit terms by the Copyright holders in their "no additional restrictions" clause in the memorandum of the permission they have given others regarding their Work. Additionally evinced by the consistent and concurrent-with-original-publishing of the work that "Anyone" is welcomed to contribute: only the "content of the code" will be evaluated.
The CoC is a Copyright violation for these reasons, and others.
Under copyright law you are not allowed to stage a public performace against the copyright owners wishes.
Nor are you allowed to make an annotation without the copyright owners wishes.
The copyright owners did not desire a CoC to be added to corpus of their work.
Nor did the copyright owners desire for, using their work as a backdrop, speech of others to be judged and punished: using their Copyrighted work as a cudgel and a lure.
The copyright owners made this explicitly clear earlier in FreeSoftware/Opensource's reign both in written statements, recorded statements, and on video.
They said that anyone was welcome to contribute: they only cared about the quality of the code. This is evidence to their intentions.
They also wrote in their Copyright License that "additional restrictions" not envisioned within the 4 corners of their License: are barred.
The CoC's are a violation, in addition to the reasons previously stated:
1) Because they are a forbidden annotation to the Corpus of the Copyrighted work (additional restrictions are barred, explicitly. Codes of Conduct are indeed additional restrictions (speech restrictions against contributors and current other copyright holders))
2) Because they are a public performance not permitted by the Copyright holders. The act of bringing "racist fascists mysoginist white males" up on "Charges" with the Corpus of Copyrighted work as the backround: is such a public performace of the Work that is barred in explicit terms by the Copyright holders in their "no additional restrictions" clause in the memorandum of the permission they have given others regarding their Work. Additionally evinced by the consistent and concurrent-with-original-publishing of the work that "Anyone" is welcomed to contribute: only the "content of the code" will be evaluated.
The CoC is a Copyright violation for these reasons, and others.
6/22/2025, 9:17:10 PM
6/16/2025, 8:05:54 PM
White people here, who hate YHWH, because "pedos", and love Jesus: who drowns pedos with millstones, constantly post
"Use the name of their real god: 𐤌𐤋𐤊 ."
As an "I win" statement.
What they, the white people, mean by " 𐤌𐤋𐤊 " is "moloch": and by posting that imply that people who like the old testament (which the white people call "the talmud" "stop quoting the talmud" when I quote the first five books of the old testament (and yes they keep saying "stop quoting the talmud, months, years later: so whites have decided that the first 5 books of the old testament are "the illegitimate talmud" here on 4chan)) worship moloch, and not god.
So I found it interesthing that said script looks familiar.
𐤌𐤋𐤊 is ancient phonecan and means "king"
looks like a y, lowercase h, and a w
𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊 is ancient phonecan that means "of the king"
YHWH.
Strange coincidence that it looks so similar
>(NOOO those "lowercase H's are Ls!)
They look like lowercase h's
How would a researcher in a cave jot them down?
Looks like yhwh if one were to transliterate into english directly from the text
(which would have been in paleo-hebrew/ancient phonecan for the name of the god, though the rest of the lettering was in square script)
Maybe the /pol/ faggot white fucks were right but stopped their research?
Marry little girls.
Even if YHWH is "moloch" (king).
Marry little girls.
Still worship YHWH.
He's pro marry little girls
"Use the name of their real god: 𐤌𐤋𐤊 ."
As an "I win" statement.
What they, the white people, mean by " 𐤌𐤋𐤊 " is "moloch": and by posting that imply that people who like the old testament (which the white people call "the talmud" "stop quoting the talmud" when I quote the first five books of the old testament (and yes they keep saying "stop quoting the talmud, months, years later: so whites have decided that the first 5 books of the old testament are "the illegitimate talmud" here on 4chan)) worship moloch, and not god.
So I found it interesthing that said script looks familiar.
𐤌𐤋𐤊 is ancient phonecan and means "king"
looks like a y, lowercase h, and a w
𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊 is ancient phonecan that means "of the king"
YHWH.
Strange coincidence that it looks so similar
>(NOOO those "lowercase H's are Ls!)
They look like lowercase h's
How would a researcher in a cave jot them down?
Looks like yhwh if one were to transliterate into english directly from the text
(which would have been in paleo-hebrew/ancient phonecan for the name of the god, though the rest of the lettering was in square script)
Maybe the /pol/ faggot white fucks were right but stopped their research?
Marry little girls.
Even if YHWH is "moloch" (king).
Marry little girls.
Still worship YHWH.
He's pro marry little girls
6/16/2025, 7:06:11 AM
>>507557049
>or normalize a younger age of consent
Yes it does.
>Anime doesnt raise birth rates
Women are the ones that want babies.
You are their ally: shifting the "blaim" to "mmmaaallleesss".
It is not our nature or job to want babies
It is our nature to want cute little girls and to dominate and rape them at all times.
Which you disagree with volently with your Jesus and his millstone, and his castrations and dick chopping off (matthew 19, greek)
>you dont need cartoons to have the things we used to have before ..
Yes we do need propaganda to show how the marrage type of God YHWH would play out. So that boys and men should seek it. YHWH's marraiges that were allowed were to little girls. In the original hebrew, the greek, and the latin translation (na'ar (yes it means child in archaic ancient hebrew of devarim), paida (child), puella (young girl).
Marraiges to used women were not what he spoke of.
Which is the only marraige you white faggots allow.
Rabinically, after first blood, a girl is not a true virgin anymore.
>you broke them just to justify your faggot cartoons
We didn't break them. You white fucks banned child brides in 1850.
In 1812 LITTLE snow white was a 7 yr old girl in the original german and the witch was her biological mother. You changed this in 1855, and then in the 1920s you made snow white a 16 yr old (and the "little" part was dropped from the title).
>Anime doesnt raise birth rates or normalize a younger age of consent and you dont need cartoons to have the things we used to have before you broke them just to justify your faggot cartoons
>or normalize a younger age of consent
Yes it does.
>Anime doesnt raise birth rates
Women are the ones that want babies.
You are their ally: shifting the "blaim" to "mmmaaallleesss".
It is not our nature or job to want babies
It is our nature to want cute little girls and to dominate and rape them at all times.
Which you disagree with volently with your Jesus and his millstone, and his castrations and dick chopping off (matthew 19, greek)
>you dont need cartoons to have the things we used to have before ..
Yes we do need propaganda to show how the marrage type of God YHWH would play out. So that boys and men should seek it. YHWH's marraiges that were allowed were to little girls. In the original hebrew, the greek, and the latin translation (na'ar (yes it means child in archaic ancient hebrew of devarim), paida (child), puella (young girl).
Marraiges to used women were not what he spoke of.
Which is the only marraige you white faggots allow.
Rabinically, after first blood, a girl is not a true virgin anymore.
>you broke them just to justify your faggot cartoons
We didn't break them. You white fucks banned child brides in 1850.
In 1812 LITTLE snow white was a 7 yr old girl in the original german and the witch was her biological mother. You changed this in 1855, and then in the 1920s you made snow white a 16 yr old (and the "little" part was dropped from the title).
>Anime doesnt raise birth rates or normalize a younger age of consent and you dont need cartoons to have the things we used to have before you broke them just to justify your faggot cartoons
6/13/2025, 7:32:10 AM
6/12/2025, 10:16:02 PM
Page 1