>>508427935
>This is just ridiculous. You have guys like Steven Anderson promoting PSA saying...
I am going to stop you there. Steven Anderson is not a serious person (let alone being the Pope of PSA) therefore citing him is not serious IMO.

>Then you have the Christus Victor model which says His suffering on the Cross, while being completely sinless,
Those elements are in all atonement models. >defeated the devil at that moment.
and how did he do that?
Christus victor teaches that Christ could not be contained by death (obviously) and therefore was able to overcome it and resurrect. So he has defeated the symptom, now what about sin, more importantly the penalty owing for sin.
“God gave himself in the person of his Son to suffer instead of us the death, punishment and curse due to fallen humanity as the penalty for our sin”. - Pierced for Our Transgressions by Steve Jeffery, Michael Ovey, and Andrew Sach

>Sounds like a synonym for meaningless.
We you are clearly reading it wrong, and I notice you chose to focus on insignificant rather than
>small
Also can you answer the question?
Sneed has a ball and he passes the ball to feed. Feed then passes the ball to seed. You ask seed where the ball came from and seed says “from sneed and feed”, is seed lying?

>That doesn't really prove anything, because I believe they're wrong on Soteriology, so it's impossible to have coherence.
Anon I am not attacking you. I was just sharing my experiance with EOs. At no point have I said "uh well you are wrong about soteriology". Be at peace, I am not looking for a gottcha.
>They are not radically different on every other aspect of theology.
No, not really. However since Soteriology is just a major one it has huge practical impacts that leaves any external unity hollow.