>>149360271
>It's like there's some weird mental disconnect between Clark Kent and the violence of Superman in his head.
Actually, I'll just say this. If Superman had been born a human, I don't think he would have become a superhero. And that is just a damning indictment of the bastard.

>>16702824
>That makes no sense if you're choosing a random gold ball, of which there are 3 equally likely choices?
The gold balls aren't equally likely choices. The gold ball in the gold and silver box will always be chosen if that box is chosen. Each gold ball in the all gold box will be chosen half the time if that box is chosen.

I am once again reminding you this is
>>16700326
and not Bertrand's box

>>16702824
>So again, how did I place it heads up?
Not part of the problem and not needed to be known to answer the problem.
>I thought you said I saw it? Then I must know what I saw, and you have to be able to tell me..
It's a probability problem. If I tell you what you saw, all the probabilities go to 0 or 1. Demanding this information is nonsensical.

>But you've finally further altered the problem by introducing an intermediary, which addresses the issue. Paul is not me. We are not interchangeable
You're an idiot. No, a math problem does not have a different answer depending on whether or not it refers to Paul or you in the setting up of the premise.

The problem was designed to be bait, but not in the ways you've bitched about it. You're legitimately just a fucking idiot.