Search Results
6/14/2025, 7:56:16 AM
>>507310381
>athiests claim to know so much, which is why I reject their beliefs
There are no claims associated with atheism. It is simply the lack of belief in any gods.
>I have no proof beyond the fact we breathe and think for why there is a God
We breathe and think. No gods, required.
>at the same time, I believe you fail to see how meaningful our very existence is
This is why we laugh at you. The evidence proves our existence on this Earth is all we have. Once the brain dies, the conscious has nowhere to go. There's no evidence that it glides on magic carpets through the seven gates of heaven or whatever. If you believe you conscious continues on in some kind of after life, then that split diminishes what you have here. That's your existential nihilism.
For the non-believer this life is the most precious because it is the only life.
>you claim science has all these answers
Not believing in any gods has nothing to do with any unrelated maths or science. Disbelief is just disbelief. You attack science because your ability to discern between fact and fiction is eroded by decades of cognitive dissonance. Yet my disbelief remains intact and you look foolish rejecting science.
>the big bang has many contradictory flaws in its theory,
A perfect example. A theory arrived at by the scientific method is sound and reasonable, because it is based on evidence, analysis, challenge and acceptance. And it's always a one-way ratchet - supernatural explanations are replaced by scientific ones, never the other way around.
>athiests claim to know so much, which is why I reject their beliefs
There are no claims associated with atheism. It is simply the lack of belief in any gods.
>I have no proof beyond the fact we breathe and think for why there is a God
We breathe and think. No gods, required.
>at the same time, I believe you fail to see how meaningful our very existence is
This is why we laugh at you. The evidence proves our existence on this Earth is all we have. Once the brain dies, the conscious has nowhere to go. There's no evidence that it glides on magic carpets through the seven gates of heaven or whatever. If you believe you conscious continues on in some kind of after life, then that split diminishes what you have here. That's your existential nihilism.
For the non-believer this life is the most precious because it is the only life.
>you claim science has all these answers
Not believing in any gods has nothing to do with any unrelated maths or science. Disbelief is just disbelief. You attack science because your ability to discern between fact and fiction is eroded by decades of cognitive dissonance. Yet my disbelief remains intact and you look foolish rejecting science.
>the big bang has many contradictory flaws in its theory,
A perfect example. A theory arrived at by the scientific method is sound and reasonable, because it is based on evidence, analysis, challenge and acceptance. And it's always a one-way ratchet - supernatural explanations are replaced by scientific ones, never the other way around.
Page 1