>>715948320
Can you show me an example for ANY amusement park ticket which said
>IT WON'T LAST TWO DAYS
instead of
>valid for the day
What the absolute fuck are you talking about?

>>713786147
What the fuck are you talking about?
Companies are willing to completely fuck over anyone just for the bottom line to go up by .1%
They are willing to completely sabotage the quality and integrity of their games simply because some advisor told them that diversity topics may increase the line by some arbitrary value.
You think they would care about a minor or ANY inconvenience to the devs when that means losing atleast 10% of that bottom line?

>>713725149
>fire should be banned because some people will 100% become arsonists