>>81529184
>I'm pampered because I can practice rear facing perceptions?
Yes.
>If I can make a choice today, then tomorrow look back on the choice and make all sorts of meta observations about the nature of choices and the consequences thereof, I'm somehow pampered?
Yes. That's not having the rug of causality pulled out under you. Even Jung raved on about this during talks on synchronicities, despite not consolidating the implications it had.

>Just because my life isn't full to the brim with nonstop entropic chaos that I have the time to analyze my choices, I'm pampered?
Honestly, yes. It could get even worse with at least the social interactions, social status, social security, relationships, social mobility eroding because of the cognitive dissonance of people around you that have to choose whether they have to explain their observations with your orchestrations of ill intent, witchcraft, or whatever it is that still doesn't resolve the sensibly uncanny disturbance in their guts triggering insensible projections and whatnot.

>If anything, the refusal to examine suffering is what makes you soft. l
One can write stale and dusty retrospective fanfictions and extrapolations of cherry-picked fragments of recalled frames of perceptions all they want, but that's not examination.
>To endure suffering without reflection is to be at the mercy of it. To reflect is to reclaim agency over it.
OCD rat race power games.

>That's what you're doing.
Yes.