>>17777080
>It's still *true* whether you want to call me a conspiracist or not
No, your conspiracy theory couldn't be further from the truth, which is why your reply entirely sets aside genetic evidence, historical accounts, archaeological records, fundamental concepts shared by all Jewish rites and denominations, and so on, resting instead on one unprovenanced textual critique comparing a Chabad halakhist (Halakhah is not the Talmud, by the way) to a New Testament epistle from Paul (who, as far as I'm aware, turned in his Jew card and was not a Gnostic either). Nonsense from top to bottom.