Search Results
7/7/2025, 2:07:29 AM
>>936740219
If you cannot be arsed to tell me what you are saying is the right test, I cannot be arsed to start digging up websites to map my historical journey through testing.
I have developed strategies for raising my IQ, it has little to do with repeat testing on similar tests. In fact, if I repeat tests, I get the same response because I use intelligence, not memory.
There are some flaws in my prior strategy so my estimated IQ is in fact higher by average than I deduced as 133, however it is entirely possible I can take a test and find myself in the region of 120 IQ if the test is foreign enough and designed by divergences to systematic parameters that dictate unknown variables. I doubt it will ever be lower, but stuff happens, and I would be content to know I have something to learn about an alternate system's rules.
I am aware I have flaws and my strategic capabilities are limited to my scope of knowledge so IQ is but a tedium.
I have had enough of this conversation. I think it is time for me to begin responding in Buddhist terms and avoiding debates on intelligence to keep the peace and give me peace.
On that note, the difference of each unique journey to the next is sufficient that stating intellectual superiority is a flawed and imbalanced disharmony with universal truths, which supersede the intellectual capability of non-divine minds to establish perfect clarity. There is one intelligence, and it is all.
If you cannot be arsed to tell me what you are saying is the right test, I cannot be arsed to start digging up websites to map my historical journey through testing.
I have developed strategies for raising my IQ, it has little to do with repeat testing on similar tests. In fact, if I repeat tests, I get the same response because I use intelligence, not memory.
There are some flaws in my prior strategy so my estimated IQ is in fact higher by average than I deduced as 133, however it is entirely possible I can take a test and find myself in the region of 120 IQ if the test is foreign enough and designed by divergences to systematic parameters that dictate unknown variables. I doubt it will ever be lower, but stuff happens, and I would be content to know I have something to learn about an alternate system's rules.
I am aware I have flaws and my strategic capabilities are limited to my scope of knowledge so IQ is but a tedium.
I have had enough of this conversation. I think it is time for me to begin responding in Buddhist terms and avoiding debates on intelligence to keep the peace and give me peace.
On that note, the difference of each unique journey to the next is sufficient that stating intellectual superiority is a flawed and imbalanced disharmony with universal truths, which supersede the intellectual capability of non-divine minds to establish perfect clarity. There is one intelligence, and it is all.
Page 1