>>510788350
>Dispossessing a myriad of tribes is nowhere near on the same level as what TND would entail, are you serious?
Yes I am. It wouldn't be hard.
>Are you seriously equating these things?
Yes. Whites were affected. Still are. Slaves weren't remote workers, they had to live on the land they worked and whites had to deal with any consequences with slave owners failed to control them or freed them, and had to compete with them (and their owners) if they wanted to do plant as well. You are an imbecile if you think this had no effect on whites.
>Your ignorance of Southern cultural perspectives on miscegenation is unsurprising.
I know the average southerner didn't like it but those mullattos didn't simply materialize from the ether. Slave owners created them. So many blacks are a hodge-podge of genetics because of Southern owners doing bad deeds.
>Jefferson Davis was a gentleman and a patriot, literally shut your whore mouth
He sacrificed you own neighbors lives for the right to keep cheap nonwhite labor. Nothing more, nothing less.
>One enshrines White Supremacy
What a joke. And no, they are the same. There were nonwhite and kike slave owners abound. It was about cheap nonwhite labor, not whites. About money.
>Let's make an alliance with Germany against trading partners we've had for centuries who can actually strike against us
British? Doing anything against us? They wouldn't have lasted against the Germans even with Soviet support if we simply stopped supporting them. The UK and France instigated that war and would have lost without the US bankrolling them and the soviets. They did all they could to get us in the war, they were no threat to us. But neither were the germans or japanese. The UK was on the decline and Germany was on the rise, it would have been more profitable for the US to make deals with Germany and Japan in exchange for advantageous trading rights rather than war with them. Only ideologues and kike lovers disagree