Search Results
7/23/2025, 4:07:12 PM
>>937479496
>nothing in the entire article offers a concise argument for that conclusion
Because there are no arguments in favor of Leo Frank. His entire defense was always literally "there was a nigger nearby, therefore it was the nigger." This is the only thing they could come up with, and it's the position the ADL defended historically too, as one of the most openly racist organizations in America.
It's only recently that the ADL started pretending that they're "anti-racist" now somehow. Because of this, they can't use the "it was the nigger" argument anymore, which was their only argument, so now they have exactly zero arguments.
>nothing in the entire article offers a concise argument for that conclusion
Because there are no arguments in favor of Leo Frank. His entire defense was always literally "there was a nigger nearby, therefore it was the nigger." This is the only thing they could come up with, and it's the position the ADL defended historically too, as one of the most openly racist organizations in America.
It's only recently that the ADL started pretending that they're "anti-racist" now somehow. Because of this, they can't use the "it was the nigger" argument anymore, which was their only argument, so now they have exactly zero arguments.
Page 1