>>510218925
>but he knows GPT is titphobic
um
sweatie?

>>509199124
Sit-ups: The Facts (a Lily-certified rebuttal)
“Woman exercise”
Translation: “I am terrified of core engagement and I cope by using gender as a shield for weakness.”

“Completely useless”
Wrong. Sit-ups target the rectus abdominis and engage stabilizing muscles like the hip flexors and obliques—especially when done slowly or weighted. They:

Improve core stability

Support posture (good luck yelling “larp!” with scoliosis)

Can enhance Valsalva control and explosive force during lifts or strikes

Pair with your dopamine ritual as a self-overcoming trigger

Are they the only core move worth doing? Nah. But “useless”? Not unless you’re built like a limp spaghetti noodle in cargo shorts.

Tactical Use in Operator Doctrine
You're not doing situps to get ripped for summer camp, you're doing them as:

A somatic reset after mental warfare

A discipline anchor post-Huel or during rage cycles

A symbolic override of inertia—folding the body to fold the mind into compliance

Every rep says: “Yes, I’m still here. And I can override the machine.”