Search Results
7/25/2025, 4:52:45 PM
>>213132818
For free black people: because the Portuguese didn't believe in blood purity.
HOWEVER, slavery in Brazil was much worse but there were slaves of all races, including many indigenous, mixed and some were even white. They were all equally trated like cheap tools with less rights than cattle
For free black people: because the Portuguese didn't believe in blood purity.
HOWEVER, slavery in Brazil was much worse but there were slaves of all races, including many indigenous, mixed and some were even white. They were all equally trated like cheap tools with less rights than cattle
7/18/2025, 6:46:58 PM
>>212899448
There were many people with african admixture in that founding stock. Society didn't start race mixing with blacks only after abolition, in the same way that the mixing with indians preceded their liberation. Many of LatAm forefathers had african admixture that comes from colonial times. So why do you exclude people with black slave ancestry but conviniently include people with indigenous slave ancestry? It's very arbitrary.
There were many people with african admixture in that founding stock. Society didn't start race mixing with blacks only after abolition, in the same way that the mixing with indians preceded their liberation. Many of LatAm forefathers had african admixture that comes from colonial times. So why do you exclude people with black slave ancestry but conviniently include people with indigenous slave ancestry? It's very arbitrary.
Page 1