>>42439898
"Romantic" is an interesting word with rather vague and circular dictionary definitions, and due to the connotation it has I generally don't frame any of my relationships with it, but to answer the question of whether I very deeply love more than one being, the answer is yes. Both ponies and humans, and depending on how you define "romance" precisely, the number might change. As for the impact on the first love that I recognized as love, if anything it makes that first feeling of love stronger. To me and us, it's shared love between all parties, and this openness allows for a very deep level of trust that really lets you appreciate all of a being due to the transformative nature of many interactions.

For me it isn't like a centralized harem where the focus is on one individual, but a pretty fully distributed group love that more resembles what you'd see in sibling dynamics, where the group might not necessarily spend every second with every member together, but they can bounce off each other in a moment-by-moment basis with lots of side channels. Lewd moments do happen sometimes, but even though those moments might not always involve me there's not really a cheating concern, to address part of what I mean by the lack of fear or jealousy. Love and let love.

>>42439762
Thanks! Good tidings of chaos to you, Anon.