>>713606286
I'm glad you agree. We have people out in the wild right now telling people that Concord was actually good, and the chuds just review bombed it.

People are going to try, and do Concord again, and nobody can pull it up, and go "Yeah, you're going to fund this shit?" because it's basically impossible to play it.

Even bad games are useful as a learning tool.

>>508675645
kek