Search Results
7/6/2025, 2:22:51 AM
>>509611332
>I wanted to ask older anons: Why is divorce so common in the West ?
Marriage has become a material transaction where bank accounts are simply combined and it can be easily broken like any other material transaction as a means in of itself, removed from any greater immaterial purpose. This is a significant pivot from the traditional western purpose for marriage which is to use that combination of resources to raise an immediate family which make up the next generation to be initiated into the traditions and culture of the extended family and broader community. Be it a dowry or dower there has always been some kind of material trade used to barter marriages to meet this goal. Your culture has maintained the arranged marriage scheme as a way of family planning and to ensure even the uggos get laid. The West decided to hell with the community, traditions and culture from which it was birthed and went full retard with the feminism and other enlightenment drivel. The incentive just isn't there. As a young man you have to ask yourself is the woman you're thinking about marrying going wage protracted litigation in which your children, if any, become casualties so she can get a house on a whim? This removes the male incentive and causes many to act like shitbags after arriving at nihilistic conclusions. This devolution turns many women into spiteful mutants who either perpetuate the cycle or simply choose not participate because there are an increasing number of shitbags. This causes the pool of available brides which a lasting relationship can be built with to drivel. You also see an increasing arrogance born out of selectiveness among those potential brides as they subconsciously realize they are an increasingly rarer creature. This makes their behavior worse.
>tl;dr women
>I wanted to ask older anons: Why is divorce so common in the West ?
Marriage has become a material transaction where bank accounts are simply combined and it can be easily broken like any other material transaction as a means in of itself, removed from any greater immaterial purpose. This is a significant pivot from the traditional western purpose for marriage which is to use that combination of resources to raise an immediate family which make up the next generation to be initiated into the traditions and culture of the extended family and broader community. Be it a dowry or dower there has always been some kind of material trade used to barter marriages to meet this goal. Your culture has maintained the arranged marriage scheme as a way of family planning and to ensure even the uggos get laid. The West decided to hell with the community, traditions and culture from which it was birthed and went full retard with the feminism and other enlightenment drivel. The incentive just isn't there. As a young man you have to ask yourself is the woman you're thinking about marrying going wage protracted litigation in which your children, if any, become casualties so she can get a house on a whim? This removes the male incentive and causes many to act like shitbags after arriving at nihilistic conclusions. This devolution turns many women into spiteful mutants who either perpetuate the cycle or simply choose not participate because there are an increasing number of shitbags. This causes the pool of available brides which a lasting relationship can be built with to drivel. You also see an increasing arrogance born out of selectiveness among those potential brides as they subconsciously realize they are an increasingly rarer creature. This makes their behavior worse.
>tl;dr women
7/4/2025, 12:17:37 AM
>>509435528
What are they going to do with all the new SuperMax Alligator Prisons once the illegals have been deported?
What are they going to do with all the new SuperMax Alligator Prisons once the illegals have been deported?
6/23/2025, 2:22:10 AM
>>508400084
>anon doesn't realize this was still better than what the iranian army had at the time
>anon also doesn't realize the iranian army was only 6 divisions at the time
The fact you're trying to draw this comparison is pants-on-head retarded.
>anon doesn't realize this was still better than what the iranian army had at the time
>anon also doesn't realize the iranian army was only 6 divisions at the time
The fact you're trying to draw this comparison is pants-on-head retarded.
Page 1