>>508556218
Whoever paid for this psyop should get their fucking money back.

>>508493532
I looked at her material.
She's legit in the notion that she's saying "Men are not turning conservative just because they're sexless" which is a huge step away from usual Democrat discourse.
The problem is she's not actually interested in appealing to men, she just thinks that men have to be convinced that Democrat social issues (trannies, abortions, etc) are actually important and affect them somehow.

It's one step forward two steps back thinking.