>>714655658
Still doesn't make sense, because servicing/repairing a car for profit by a third party company is not illegal in any sense and neither is it mandated by law for 3rd parties to do repairs for you outside of delivery issues, ie. received a broken car. It also doesn't consider that you can buy a very old car for which the manufacturer doesn't even exist anymore, where you basically have no righs due to common sense.

Software works very differently. Video games are compiled into machine code and are quite literally walled off by nature, without even considering the additional mechanism of anti cheat modules. They are not open source (besides mono based ones), which means you have to tamper with it by reverse engineering if you want to fix anything. By that point you've already broken 3 property laws that pertains to software. Now imagine selling your "fix" for commercial purposes ie offering "repairs". Do you really want to go to prison for +10 years? Additionally, how would you even hold people legally accountable if we disregard the fact that it already is illegal? So there's this game, which has features that doesn't work but modder X fixed them for free; can the game now legally be sold again because he "repaired" it? is X now legally accountable and is forced to maintain repairs because otherwise he will be responsible that the game doesn't work? This whole car part analogy is completely fucking retarded and would only work if every game was open source and had a github with democratically elected reviewers - right after abolishing property laws.