Search Results
6/27/2025, 11:46:14 AM
>>17794799
Modern genetic studies prove that the Romans were Whiter than modern day Italians before being swarmed with immigrants from the Near East:
>Italian genetic history was profoundly shaped by Romans. While the Iron Age was comparable to contemporary European regions, the gene pool of Central Italy underwent significant influence from Near Eastern ancestry during the Imperial age. To explain this shift, it has been proposed that during this period people from Eastern Mediterranean regions of the Empire migrated towards its political center. In this study, by analyzing a new individual (1.25x) and published Republican samples, we propose a novel perspective for the presence of Near Eastern ancestry in the Imperial gene pool. In our scenario, the spread of this genetic ancestry took place during the late Republican period, predating the onset of the Empire by ∼200 years. The diffusion of this ancestry may have occurred due to early East-to-West movements, since Eastern Mediterranean regions were already under Roman political influence during the Republic, or even as a result of migration from Southern Italy where Greeks and Phoenicians settled.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.07.617003v1
Modern genetic studies prove that the Romans were Whiter than modern day Italians before being swarmed with immigrants from the Near East:
>Italian genetic history was profoundly shaped by Romans. While the Iron Age was comparable to contemporary European regions, the gene pool of Central Italy underwent significant influence from Near Eastern ancestry during the Imperial age. To explain this shift, it has been proposed that during this period people from Eastern Mediterranean regions of the Empire migrated towards its political center. In this study, by analyzing a new individual (1.25x) and published Republican samples, we propose a novel perspective for the presence of Near Eastern ancestry in the Imperial gene pool. In our scenario, the spread of this genetic ancestry took place during the late Republican period, predating the onset of the Empire by ∼200 years. The diffusion of this ancestry may have occurred due to early East-to-West movements, since Eastern Mediterranean regions were already under Roman political influence during the Republic, or even as a result of migration from Southern Italy where Greeks and Phoenicians settled.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.07.617003v1
6/27/2025, 9:34:26 AM
>>17795223
>romans were brown
No they weren't, modern genetic studies prove the fact that the Romans were actually White (which anyone with half a brain already knew), until being swarmed with non-White immigrants from their empire:
>Italian genetic history was profoundly shaped by Romans. While the Iron Age was comparable to contemporary European regions, the gene pool of Central Italy underwent significant influence from Near Eastern ancestry during the Imperial age. To explain this shift, it has been proposed that during this period people from Eastern Mediterranean regions of the Empire migrated towards its political center. In this study, by analyzing a new individual (1.25x) and published Republican samples, we propose a novel perspective for the presence of Near Eastern ancestry in the Imperial gene pool. In our scenario, the spread of this genetic ancestry took place during the late Republican period, predating the onset of the Empire by ∼200 years. The diffusion of this ancestry may have occurred due to early East-to-West movements, since Eastern Mediterranean regions were already under Roman political influence during the Republic, or even as a result of migration from Southern Italy where Greeks and Phoenicians settled.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.07.617003v1
This precipitated the abandonment of the noble practice of pederasty and the decline of their empire. All cultural achievement in Italy since this mass replacement, including the Renaissance, occurred in the north of Italy (where coincidentally, pederasty was widespread), where they have remained relatively racially pure. The Germanic migrations also hardly left an impact on Roman genetics. There are plenty of Brits that look like the picture you posted.
>romans were brown
No they weren't, modern genetic studies prove the fact that the Romans were actually White (which anyone with half a brain already knew), until being swarmed with non-White immigrants from their empire:
>Italian genetic history was profoundly shaped by Romans. While the Iron Age was comparable to contemporary European regions, the gene pool of Central Italy underwent significant influence from Near Eastern ancestry during the Imperial age. To explain this shift, it has been proposed that during this period people from Eastern Mediterranean regions of the Empire migrated towards its political center. In this study, by analyzing a new individual (1.25x) and published Republican samples, we propose a novel perspective for the presence of Near Eastern ancestry in the Imperial gene pool. In our scenario, the spread of this genetic ancestry took place during the late Republican period, predating the onset of the Empire by ∼200 years. The diffusion of this ancestry may have occurred due to early East-to-West movements, since Eastern Mediterranean regions were already under Roman political influence during the Republic, or even as a result of migration from Southern Italy where Greeks and Phoenicians settled.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.07.617003v1
This precipitated the abandonment of the noble practice of pederasty and the decline of their empire. All cultural achievement in Italy since this mass replacement, including the Renaissance, occurred in the north of Italy (where coincidentally, pederasty was widespread), where they have remained relatively racially pure. The Germanic migrations also hardly left an impact on Roman genetics. There are plenty of Brits that look like the picture you posted.
Page 1