Search Results
6/19/2025, 5:39:28 AM
>>81538521
>Absurd. It's no more impossible than proving any other subjective experience.
You've already established suffering (and its would-be opposite) is psychological first, subjective experience second, without saying how it's as provable as pain.
>So now any level of cognitive impairment means a person can't reflect at all?
Strawman.
>Pain and suffering are not opposites. They're not even on the same plane of existence. Pain is merely a biological signal, suffering is a psychological phenomenon.
>You could say that suffering is psychological pain, but even that sells it short. It's not measurable in the same sense because suffering can happen without physical pain.
All true, because suffering is made-up, a production of the transcendent function, the archdemon that hijacked the portal through the virus that was contained within the social construct.
>Unless, of course, you're trying to argue that the psyche itself doesn't exist and that it's merely a figment of its own imagination.
Not today.
>>with better alternatives
>Such as?
We may only hope they exist...
>The transcendent function is STRICTLY about dichotomies. It's the bridge between two opposites (aka dichotomies), such as the conscious and unconscious
It's pre-dichotomy. The dichotomies (conscious mind invention btw) are collateral damage caught up in its flows.
>It is in the first place a purely natural process, which may in some cases pursue its course without the knowledge or assistance of the individual, and can sometimes forcibly accomplish itself in the face of opposition (Collected Works 7, par. 186)
>Absurd. It's no more impossible than proving any other subjective experience.
You've already established suffering (and its would-be opposite) is psychological first, subjective experience second, without saying how it's as provable as pain.
>So now any level of cognitive impairment means a person can't reflect at all?
Strawman.
>Pain and suffering are not opposites. They're not even on the same plane of existence. Pain is merely a biological signal, suffering is a psychological phenomenon.
>You could say that suffering is psychological pain, but even that sells it short. It's not measurable in the same sense because suffering can happen without physical pain.
All true, because suffering is made-up, a production of the transcendent function, the archdemon that hijacked the portal through the virus that was contained within the social construct.
>Unless, of course, you're trying to argue that the psyche itself doesn't exist and that it's merely a figment of its own imagination.
Not today.
>>with better alternatives
>Such as?
We may only hope they exist...
>The transcendent function is STRICTLY about dichotomies. It's the bridge between two opposites (aka dichotomies), such as the conscious and unconscious
It's pre-dichotomy. The dichotomies (conscious mind invention btw) are collateral damage caught up in its flows.
>It is in the first place a purely natural process, which may in some cases pursue its course without the knowledge or assistance of the individual, and can sometimes forcibly accomplish itself in the face of opposition (Collected Works 7, par. 186)
Page 1