>>714460423
>You were never engaged in earnest in the first place.
yup, that's what i said
>You never had an argument.
i chose not to engage because you wouldn't listen anyway, as evidenced by the first sentence lmao
>You're angry at a childs cartoon that was popular for 12 years straight and is still ongoing.
says who
>There's nothing else to explain.
you can't fathom any explanation because whatever programmed you didn't provide you the script. you're just too dumb to get it. unironically.