>>63841447
>wiping out Iran is actually a legit military necessity for west now
>Necessity

You could argue a value since there's a value to it for sure but a necessity? No. When you phrase it like that it comes across as what it - and you - are - someone shilling for Israel who wants to convince the US and West to do dirty work for them just as with Saddam and how it'd benefit everyone - except whoops that benefitted nobody because of no plan for the day after. In a vacuum? No regime and yeah that'd be good. But you're making me realize that's actually a perennial issue for Israel. Holy shit actually:
>Support Ahmed Yassin the founder of Hamas to get back at PLO [Whoops Hamas now problem]
>Support Iran (Iran-Contra) to get back at Saddam [Whoops now Iran problem]
>Support Phalangites to get at PLO
>Okay this one actually didn't catastrophically fail in that the Lebanese Christians are not more anti-Israel than they had been, but it still wasn't generally an actual policy success.
>Supporting Gaza clans against Hamas [I'm sure this won't cause problems in the future]
There's never a plan for the day after. If they had one I wouldn't be as irritable but they never fucking have one. It's just
"But I did eat breakfast this morning"