>>57893754
Fine, I'll let you have this one, you have 4 Pokemon that survive getting melted from existence in a single hit, you still lose regardless.
>>57893795
>The Galarian are chimeric in nature and only one of them can entirely be classified as purely a dinosaur, which would be Dracozolt, which has the upper portion of a Dromeosaur and the lower half of what can be assumed to be a Stegosauridae
>The Arcto portion is based off of a Mosasaur, which weren't dinosaurs and in fact were more closely related to monitor lizards
>The Vish portion is based on a Dunkleosteus which was a Placoderm fish that existed millions of years before the dinosaurs in the Devonian
>"Most of the grass starters"
>3 actually, and despite the obvious Dromeosaur inspirations, it's pretty clear Sceptile and Grovyle are still more largely based on geckos, but sure, I'll be generous and count it
>Genesect is a primitive arthropod modified by technology, not a dinosaur retard, not even part of Chordata
>"Basically all of the Dragon types"
>A palm tree, 2 salamanders, an antlion nymphid, 2 sea horses, a crested lizard, wyrms tha live in apples and are clearly more so based on Squamata, gigantic slugs, bats, a nature spirit, a Diplocaulus, several more members of Squamata, 4 aliens that have literally nothing to do with Sauria as a whole, A BUILDING, BALL, FISH and a bunch of chimeras that do possess some dinosaur features, as well as birds, which did evolve from small Dromeosaurs, which would be 3 Pokemon, 4 of you want to squint and take Reshiram in
>In total there are unquestionably 10 Dragons that are based directly on dinosaurs, 13 to 14 if you want to be extra generous
>Out of 93, only 10 or so Dragon types are actually dinosaurs
>The weather trio
>Kyogre is obviously a whale, Rayquaza's closest comparable match in bodyplan would be a Mexican mole lizard, Groudon is the only one that has been described with "dinosaur-like aspects", so sure, that one I'll let slip
>"Kaijumons"