>>81771000
yes its my words. Im making an assumption that you dont care about whats true because you ignored what i posted above that disproved the idea that making markets more free will lead to monopolies and higher prices. I gave you a specific example and you would rather not address why the median house price in Argentina went down 10% after deregulation. It dosn't fit into your idea of how the world works so you ignore it. I also have not insulted you this whole time while you have made insults the whole time. see for example (1).

What im talking about has nothing to do with people being more or less selfish. Thats up to the individual person and culture to decide.

While it is true we are not in a debate club, when discussing ideas there needs to be mutual respect and cooperation to get closer to the truth. I think you are scared of this process or are unwilling to abide by the conditions able to make seeking the truth possible. For example, implying I must support "child brides" "slaves" and support a selfish and individualistic attitude. And saying im "triggered" and not addressing a thing i have said. Why are people like you so closed minded and needlessly aggressive? I will refer you to this resource (2), but as of now i dont think having a conversation with a person like you would benefit either of us. Goodbye
1:
>>81770661
2:
https://therulesofcivilconversation.org/