Search Results
7/13/2025, 2:01:14 PM
>On closer inspection it appears that what Kepler, in a simple and sublime manner, articulated in the form of laws of celestial motion, Newton converted into the nonconceptual, reflective form of the force of gravity. The whole manner of this "proof" presents in general a confused tissue of lines of merely geometrical construction to which a physical meaning of independent forces is given, of the empty concepts of the understanding of a force of acceleration, of particles of time, at whose beginning those forces always play a renewed role, and of a force of inertia, which presumably continues its previous effect, and so on. A rational proof of the quantitative determinations of free motion can only rest on the determinations of the concepts of space and time, the moments whose relation is motion and furthermore blah blah blah blah blah blah
>*thinks there are only 7 planets, hypnotic mesmerism and that magnets make things heavier*
>*thinks there are only 7 planets, hypnotic mesmerism and that magnets make things heavier*
Page 1