>>11818207
>perfectly good maps
If they were perfectly good they wouldn't get rejected.
>>11818212
Probably a better way to go around it.
Ep 1 - vanilla compat
Ep 2 - boom
Ep 3 - I'd allow full on GZDoom features, room over room, whatever the fuck. But that might annoy purists.
>>11818219
>besides It's like segregating the low-quality maps from the more detailed ones
detail != quality. That's a weird way to think about it.