>>532688579
I feel like it won't just affect Britbongs. When it comes to sites that are only partially NSFW, isn't t possible that they will sanitize those sites for everyone to avoid having to implement ID verification? They know it impacts traffic.
I've been thinking as of late that the internet in general should be like 15+ if not 18+, since I know I personally was fucked up by being on the internet at a young age and clearly so were many others. Gen Z is extremely maladjusted, mentally ill, radicalized, and socially isolated. But it's just so difficult and inconvenient to enforce, there's inappropriate content all over even normie platforms like the ones you mentioned.
>spoiler
Some do work here, depends on a couple things.
>>532688759
Twitter Takeovers saying Shadow's favorite Emerald is the purple one should be a crime. Man, should be green, or at the very least the blue or cyan one.
>>532688854
I kneel to Scribbles.

>>529547721
He doesn't. Ultimate Lifeforms don't need to.