Consistency, reusability, and expressionism are still huge problems in AI, so unless it's a oneshot, I don't see it as a production ready product. But I'm impressed by how well it retained the sketch's core characteristics, even in a super rough draft. Looks incredible useful for bg rendering.

>>7631924
Just do your thing. The stigma will eventually go away. Before this, it was 3D models > computer graphics > photobashing/compositing > photography > paint pans/tubes, etc.

>>7632018
I think you're interpreting the torso as a single unit, when it's actually two masses joined together by skin and muscle. Try doing it again, but sketching it as two separate masses first. Do it multiple times...

>>7632029
keep going, your effort is paying off.

>>7632055
yeah, the X shape around the inguinal area is a very odd choice

>>7631902
>Do you think you will pay me to teach you how to draw? Or am I too beg to be teaching?
teaching is a tricky subject. It's not just about the teacher's proficiency, I would say it's more about whether you can help me solve the problems I'm going to encounter. what value are you adding?
a good example of this is producers. Take Rick Rubin, zero skill in music, but he's really good at removing roadblocks. If you can do that, I’d buy your product.