>>60693643
>The statements where you entirely ignore points you disagree with and call me a kike and then move to statements where you disingenuously pretend once again you actually do want to have a high level debate and present the exact same already acknowledged thesis.
Again, can you enumerate exactly which points, of my 4 initial posts in this bread, you disagree with?
>There’s no actual discussion here,
There is discussion from my end. I always answer each point in part.
There is only seethe and cope and coom-plaining from your end. And the end of the other pro-capitalism, pro-banking shills.
>there’s you cherry picking lines that let you alliterate on your already predetermined course of discussion you’re unwilling to waver from.
Why not just say what you disagree with, exactly, though?
>So instead I’ll just call you a /pol/ tard
Guilty as charged.
>and make fun of you because you’re brain damaged from rage bait.
Ok.